In times of universal deceit, telling
the truth is a revolutionary act.
         - George Orwell

Napoleon once observed that "history" is a set of lies agreed upon. In an era of ubiquitous fake news and information warfare, this has never been more true. The very concept of objective truth in history is fading out of our world. Pure propaganda and outright lies are passing into our history textbooks as unquestioned truth, condemning future generations to false views about historical reality. But the task of sifting through the lies and propaganda is overwhelming, limited by the ambition and time constraints of most observors. Only those who have dedicated their lives to sorting reality from falsehood are qualified to rewrite "consensus" history as a duty to humanity. The contributors to this site endeavor to do just that.

(Read More)

Sunday, April 9, 2017

Proof: US Backed Plan for ISIS to Launch Chemical Weapon Attack on Syria, Then Blame It On Assad's Regime

        Reposted from, Original from                 
     The ugly truth is beginning to emerge:  the recent sarin gas attack in Syria was NOT the work of the Assad regime, but rather the US-backed "rebel" fighters.  News is now emerging from within US intelligence circles that Russia's account of the origins of the gas attack is correct:  ISIS fighters had a storehouse of chemical weapons in Khan Sheikhoun, and were preparing to use them as part of a covert operation (in a repeat of the August 2014 operation) to pin the blame on Assad and elicit a strong American response.  You can read the ex-CIA officer's account at:
      Now, it is emerging that the UK's Daily Mail reportedly saw this coming back in 2013.  On January 29th of that year, they reported on stolen/leaked emails from a Pentagon defense contractor that showed the devious plan being worked out.  Three days later, the article mysteriously disappeared from Daily Mail archives.
     Given the rapid pace of events in recent days and our headlong march into nuclear conflict with Russia, it is time to give this matter a second look.  It is imperative to get the Truth out before it is too late.

Deleted Daily Mail Online Article: “US Backed Plan for Chemical Weapon Attack in Syria to Be Blamed on Assad”

  8612  201 

This article was first published by GR in June 2013,  the author is the truthnewsinternational blogsite.  
In January 29, 2013, Britain’s most popular Daily Newspaper, in its online version published an article titled:

U.S. ‘backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad’s regime’

A few days later they pulled the article.
What the reason was for the deletion remains unclear. The article was published at this URL:
There exists a cached version of the article which can be found here:
See scan of complete deleted article below
syria, emails, Daily Mail, deleted article
One day later, on January 30, a moderated news board thread was created, which is still online, at Mail Online about that article. Thread: Syrian WMD False Flag – Are False Flags a way of life now?
In their initial article Mail Online refers to an article (dated January 28, 2013), that’s where they probably found the information on the leaked e-mail and other documents.
CapitalBay  (who published the wrong areal pictures of the school in Sandy Hook), Mail OnlineInfowarsYahoo News IndiaNews Track IndiaWhale.toPhilippine TimesUganda NewsLiveLeakTruth Media TV and others all claim in their mirrored articles that the alleged e-mail from Britam’s David Goulding to Philip Doughty was dated December 25, 2012.
However, at (translated with Google) there also exists another version of the alleged e-mail. There the e-mail is dated December 24, 2012.
Whether the content of the alleged e-mail is correct, that’s open for debate. Fact is that PressTV has an article online which supports the claims in the alleged e-mail. And RT‘s article from last year (June 10, 2012) still claims that “Syrian rebels aim to use chemical weapons,” to then blame Assad for it. Those weapons came from Libya, according to RT. This begs the question: Did Christopher Stevens know about those weapons when he died in the CIA villa in Benghazi last year?
But why was the article pulled by Mail Online?
Why do there exist at least 2 versions of the same alleged e-mail?
And what about Britam admitting that they were hacked, according to (The Voice of Russia)?
But there’s also this, according to Mail Online it was a Malaysian hacker who got to the alleged e-mail(s), while Infowars claims that the e-mail was “obtained by a hacker in Germany.”
Either way, whoever initiated the Britam e-mail escapade did a good job at fooling both mainstream and alternative news outlets because it’s a real mess and few know what really happened and why.
Yet it’s ironic that Mail Online did not delete their other article where they wrote about the UN’s Carla Del Ponte who claims that Syrian rebels are responsible for “sarin gas attacks, which had been blamed on Assad’s troops.” The same rebels who now receive resources from the EU and the U.S., since the EU is buying oil from those “rebels” and the US is arming them for a proxy war as the Washington Post describes it.
Earlier it was reported that Israel had granted oil exploration rights inside Syria, in the occupied Golan Heights, to Genie Energy who’s shareholders include Rupert Murdoch and Lord Jacob Rothschild.
The original source of this article is truthnewsinternational

No comments:

Post a Comment