In times of universal deceit, telling
the truth is a revolutionary act.
         - George Orwell

Napoleon once observed that "history" is a set of lies agreed upon. In an era of ubiquitous fake news and information warfare, this has never been more true. The very concept of objective truth in history is fading out of our world. Pure propaganda and outright lies are passing into our history textbooks as unquestioned truth, condemning future generations to false views about historical reality. But the task of sifting through the lies and propaganda is overwhelming, limited by the ambition and time constraints of most observors. Only those who have dedicated their lives to sorting reality from falsehood are qualified to rewrite "consensus" history as a duty to humanity. The contributors to this site endeavor to do just that.

(Read More)

Monday, September 11, 2017

Sixteen Years On: 9/11 - The Big Lie

The official narrative of 9/11 can be summarized easily:  taking orders from Osama bin Laden and Khalid Sheik Mohammed, 19 fundamentalist Muslims slipped through the American intelligence drag-net and managed to hijack four planes with box-cutters, managing to crash three of those planes into their intended symbolic targets in order to terrorize Americans because they despise America's values.
This narrative, rolled out by the Bush administration on the day of the attacks, has remained intact for 16 years in "polite" circles - academia, mainstream media, political forums, and high society gatherings of every sort.  It has been repeated ad nauseum despite the overwhelming evidence contradicting it, and remains the "textbook" version of events taught in schools.  Goebbel's 'Big Lie' theory was exercised with incredible effectiveness:  repeat the Big Lie over and over again until it becomes the "truth".

        Blame was placed on "intelligence failures" across all agencies, and no one lost their job for these supposed failures.  Calls for an official inquiry fell on deaf ears, since "what happened" that day was apparently "self-evident".  In fact, many within the intelligence agencies were rewarded with promotions.
It is no coincidence that the major American television networks unanimously and unabashedly broadcast "new evidence" which proved that FDR knew of Pearl Harbour, exactly one year after 9/11.  Only astute viewers were to read between the lines and discern the meaning behind the timing, thereby making the connection:  Insiders within government also knew about THIS Day of Infamy, but allowed it to happen, for exactly the same reasons - to justify going to war.  Everyone else either ignored the 'news', or applauded the investigative research behind the finding, even if it was 60 years late in coming.  Still, with memories so short and Big Lie theory predominating over late revisionism, the myth of 'surprise attack' was still alive and well 65 years later.  [Tucker Jr., James P.  "Pearl harbor:  Mother of all conspiracies still being covered up after 65 years," in American Free Press, p. 11, Dec 18, 2006.]
President Bush fought against the creation of a commission for a whole year before relenting, and even then, he chose Henry Kissinger to head it.  Many commentators remarked that putting Kissinger in charge was akin to putting the fox in charge of the henhouse, since Kissinger is regarded by many to be one of the leading arch-conspirators in the world today.  After Kissinger refused to divulge the names of the clients of his consulting firm to clear up any conflicts-of-interest charges, he withdrew his name.  The Administration dragged its feet even longer, and squeezed the funding of the commission:  $15 million, compared to $70 million for the Kenneth Starr enquiry into President Clinton's trist with Monica Lewinsky.
It took until November, 2003 for the president to relinquish the Daily Briefings he receives from the CIA every morning to reveal what he did or did not know about the possibility of a terrorist strike in the weeks leading up to September 11th.  Finally, a 10-member bi-partisan panel formally called the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, and only colloquially called the 9/11 Commission, was set up to do what millions demanded:  find out the truth about what really happened that day.  [Hertzberg, Hendrik.  "Reluctant Witnesses," in The New Yorker, April 12, 2004, pp. 27-8.]

The 9/11 Commission Report Whitewash

Controlling the narrative through thought-control machinations have been at work with 9/11 throughout the past 16 years.  Academia and the mainstream media were busy pushing the official narrative in the years after the attacks, since the alternative was literally 'unthinkable'.  Take Wesley Wark, leading "intelligence expert" rolled out regularly on the evening news across Canada in the years following 9/11. Wark is a leading professor at the University of Toronto and president of the Canadian Association for Security and Intelligence Studies.  He states that the 9/11 commission report was the "authoritative, public document that Kean and Hamilton wanted."  "Needless to say, they found no conspiracies, except those of the terrorists themselves." [Without Precedent reviewed by Wark in The Globe & Mail, D3, Sep 9, 2006.]   Elsewhere, he stated "The 9/11 Commission Report is a masterpiece of investigation into the roots of the al-Qaeda strikes and the manifold failures of the US government to deter or prevent their happening."  Like any masterful sycophant, he gushes:  "It has just a whiff of magic to it:  an investigation that was never meant to be; secrets that we were never meant to see; a mass-market paperback that is unlike anything in the history of published government reports."  However, like the Warren Commission report, commissioners made sure there was no index, making it difficult to cross-reference anything.  [Wark, Wesley. "Just what happened on 9/11, and why it could," in The Globe & Mail, D8, Aug 7, 2004.  A review of 'The 9/11 Commission Report' (Norton Books, ed. by Steven Strasser.).]
Arch-Zionist Philip Zelikow was the executive director of the 9/11 Commission Report.  The Final Report was published by W.W. Norton.  It promised to provide "answers" to what happened that day, and to "identify lessons learned."  [DeMott, Benjamin.  "Whitewash as Public Service," in Harper's magazine, October 2004, pp. 35-45.]  "The implicit guarantee was that ahead lay a work of analysis addressed to an intelligent democratic citizenry - an inventory of possible causes of the tragedy followed by a reasoned-out, sober set of judgments about which of these causes were most plausible." [p. 36]  Harper's contributor Benjamin DeMott correctly asserts that "The promise was not kept."  The report was and is "a cheat and a fraud.  It stands as a series of evasive maneuvers that infantilize the audience, transform candor into iniquity, and conceal realities that demand immediate inspection and confrontation."  Its 567 pages "are in fact useless to historians."  "In the course of blaming everybody a little, the Commission blames nobody - blurs the reasons for the actions and hesitations of successive administrations, masks choices that, fearlessly defined, might actually have vitalized our public political discourse." [p. 36]
The Report's strategy was to generate "plausible grounds for not spelling out questions, not seeking answers."  It is, in the fullest sense of the term, a "whitewash."  "And so it goes - an array of doublespeak renamings, ill-accounted-for deprecations, evasions, silences, all demanding some kind of justification."  All it does is share the blame equally, on institutions rather than individuals, and skews the history as a giant set of "missed opportunities."  The document is really part of the culture wars - "a weapon in a major domestic conflict:  the war on incisive, sometimes rudely disruptive critical thought - thought that distinguishes the democratic citizen from the idolatrous fool, the sucker, the clueless consumer, the ad person's delight."  DeMott finally laments:  "My view is that the aura now surrounding the document and the public servants who produced it derives from growing incomprehension, in contemporary America, of the essential human cause - the progressive curve of human development - that democracy is meant to forward."
Tellingly, the two principal authors of the 9/11 Commission Report, Chairman Thomas Kean and Vice Chairman Lee Hamilton, came out afterwards to claim that they were repeatedly obstructed by bureaucrats, making getting the truth difficult.  [Kean, Thomas H., and Lee H. Hamilton.  Without Precedent:  The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission.  (Alfred A. Knopf, 2006).  Reviewed by James Bamford in The New York Times Book Review, p. 15, Aug 20, 2006.]   Independent citizens were already organizing to hold their own 'public commissions' to get to the truth of 9/11, among them Carol Brouillet of Palo Alto, Califronia, who founded  She held conferences across the USA and Canada which brought together the world's leading researchers on the subject, and came to a vastly different conclusion:  9/11 was an inside job.  The meme war would take on a whole new level of complexity.
Nearly five years after the attacks, bright intellectuals like Rex Murphy doggedly expressed their allegiance to the 'official narrarive'.  Murphy likens 9-11 "conspiracy theorists" to X-Files junkies.  "I cannot comprehend what tilt of mind refuses the tidal wave of tragic facts about that forrible day in favour of near-lunatic and unmoored speculation.  The answer has to be that the hatred of US President George Bush has, among the most strident of those who despise him, reached incandescent proportions, and has merged with that strain of free-wheeling paranoia that is an undercurrent of much of our modern times."  "The 9/11 conspiracy theories... trail in the spurious and repulsive wake of that arch-conspiracy, the demented Protocols of the Elders of Zion."  [Murphy, Rex.  "The real truth about 9/11," in The Globe & Mail, A17, July 15, 2006.]

The Propaganda War to Control the Narrative

The propaganda coup d'etat was alive and well long after the 10 commissioners completed their allotted task.  The members formed a "private educational and lobbying group" calling itself the 9/11 Public Disclosure Project, aimed at reviewing the progress made by the federal government to act on the Commission's recommendations.  Since they recommended moves that can only be described as the formation of a dictatorship, they are essentially "following up" on that mission by demanding that the new National Intelligence Agency and Homeland Security Department are doing their jobs of turning the United States into a totalitarian dictatorship.  Orwell would be rolling in his grave over this distortion of reality.
Hollywood has also played a crucial role in the meme wars and the 9/11 'official narrative' distortion of history.  After the obligatory period of grandstanding, jingoism and mourning, Hollywood was finally able to break the taboo of making films about 9/11 in 2005.  Flightplan, starring Jodi Foster, featured an airplane hijacking plot with suspicious Arabs and white-American passengers.  [Schneller, Johanna.  "9/11's many unhappy returns," in The Globe & Mail, R4, Sept 30, 2005.]
An ABC 6-hour miniseries, shot in Toronto, pretended to portray the life of John O'Neill, the former FBI agent who died at thew WTC collapse on his first day on a new job.  As with Flightplan, screenwriter Cyrus Nowrasteh, stuck to the official story by relying on The 9/11 Commission Report.  [Dixon, Guy.  "Sept. 11 miniseries shrouded in secrecy," in The Globe & Mail, R13, July 30, 2005.]
The hit series '24', starring Kiefer Sutherland, capitalized on the post-9/11 environment of fear and statism .   24 co-creator and executive producer Joel Surnow is a political conservative.  The hero of the series, Jack Bauer, employs torture to obtain information "and save lives".  The USA is constantly enduring terrorist attacks in the series.  A coup is planned against the US president because he refuses to endorse the blanket detention of Arab citizens.  Others want to bring in a draconian police state. [Doyle, John.  "24 becomes touchstone of war on terror," in The Globe & Mail, R3, Feb 19, 2007.]  The overall impression of the show incited fear and hatred of Muslims. Muslims are portrayed as terrorists and villains, devising new terrorist plots to kill Americans.  In Season 5, Muslim terrorists wage an 11-week campaign of suicide bombings across America, culminating in the detonation of a suitcase-sized nuclear bomb in Valencia, California, about 35 km north of Los Angeles.  The estimated death toll was 12,000.  [Parry, Wayne.  (AP).  "Muslims protest '24' terror direction," in The Toronto Star, D13, Jan 19, 2007.]
A similar series was unveilled by Showtime to rival Fox's '24' called Sleeper Cell.  The series portrays an undercover FBI agent who infiltrates an Islamic fundamentalist cell plotting a biological attack on Los Angeles.  As such, it fits the established mold of "cartoon ideations of can-do agents and fiendishly efficient terrorists - reflecting, perhaps, an almost childlike hunger for American indomitability at a time when news reports are less reassuring."  "In this series, the FBI is a vast bureaucracy riddled with complacent midlevel agents who carelessly screw up surveillance work and bosses who are as concerned with diverting blame as they are with deterring attacks.  Even the terrorist fanatics are killing machines with a human face."  The terrorist leader is portrayed as "silky smooth", going by the alias Yossi, who poses as a Jewish businessman who coaches Zionist Little League.
Another show, Jerico, put out by CBS, is about a post-apocalypse USA, brought about by the usual enemy:  Muslim terrorists.  "We see a character scanning a map of the US and placing red pins on locations that have probably been bombed.  It's a long list."  [Doyle, John.  "For America, it's a scary world out there," in The Globe & Mail, R3, Sept 27, 2006.]   Then there was the 2006 release of United 93 by Universal Pictures - a heroic depiction of passengers aboard the doomed flight which crashed in Pennsylvania.  It portrays an orthodox rendering of events:  Muslim men with boxcutters successfully hijacking the plane and causing it to crash.  [Bollyn, Christopher.  "Which Flight 93 Are We Talking About?" in American Free Press, p. 17, May 29, 2006.]  The movie ignores the intense controversy surrounding that flight and its supposed crash in Pennsylvania.  In fact, everything about Flight 93 is suspicious.  CNN "reporter" Brian Cabell may have gotten a little too close to the truth when he reported that Flight 93 information was strictly controlled by the feds on the morning of 9/11.  Both crash sites were staged, he claims.  More damning, there were TWO planes involves, with one being a dummy.  [Guliani, Lisa.  "Second Flight 93 Debris Field Suppressed by FBI, Major Media," in AFP p. B2, Sept 1, 2008.  Conspiracy researcher Victor Thorn, who was killed by the cryptocracy on his birthday in 2016, proved conclusively that a cruise missile was slammed into the ground near Shanksville, PA - not Flight 93.  For the full evidence, see:  Thorn, Victor.  "Defense Insider Says Missile Hit Ground, Not Plane," in American Free Press, p. 13, July 28, 2008.]
With book publishers wanting to avoid the bad publicity of "offending sensibilities", they too waiting several years after the attacks before allowing novels written about the subject of 9/11 to be released to the public.  Authors waited nearly 3 years for the "right time" to fictionalize the event.  When they did start to pour out and hit book shelves in 2004-5, they unanimously played with the same basic government-sponsored thesis:  Arab terrorists did it.  [For a survey of six novels, see:  Wyatt, Edward.  "After a Long Wait, Literary Novelists Address 9/11," in The New York Times,  B1, B7, March 7, 2005.]
Supermarket tabloid magazines weighed in.  The August 2006 issue of Vanity Fair magazine, for example, revealed an ugly truth:  taped transcripts published for the first time showed that top US military brass lied to the 9/11 commission. Among the findings:  only 4 planes were available to defend the entire north eastern quarter of the US on that day!  Two were sent on a wild goose chase, trying to find a phantom flight #11.  [Burkeman, Oliver.  "Tapes show US chased phantom plane on 9/11," in The Globe & Mail, A2, Aug 3, 2006.]  Thirty hours of NORAD tapes were disclosed showed the level of chaos in military command that morning, and there's plenty to suggest an apparent obstruction of the chain of command and information-relaying taking place which had the effect of delaying reaction times.  The tapes also showed phantom aircraft.  [Shenon, Philip.  "New Tapes Disclose Confusion Within the Military on Sept 11," in The New York Times, A16, Aug 3, 2006.]  The damning evidence is enough to warrant Colonel Robert Marr, the commanding officer in charge of NORAD's northeastern division on 9/11, to be tried for war crimes.
The controversies surrounding Flight 93 grew so loud as to cause the FBI and CIA to go into panic mode.  On April 12, 2006, a fully doctored/manufactured cockpit voice recorder of Flight 93 was released to the public, aimed at bolstering the official story of what happened aboard that plane.  Of course, it is not at all difficult for CIA labs to have manufactured the entire script, panicking voices and all.  [See full transcipt in The Globe & Mail, A18, April 13, 2006.]   This war of propaganda and competing claims for the Truth about "what happened" that day took on a whole new level of urgency on both sides.  Another 9-11 Truth Conference was held in Chicago in June, 2006, organized by Brouillet again, along with Janice Matthews.  Jesse Richard of was also there, and coined a new term - "foxymoron" - to describe the neo-conservative slant of the supposedly "fair and balanced" reports of Fox News.  Alex Jones was also in attendance.  'Truthers', as they were called, became mainstream.
"Inside 9/11", produced by National Geographic and shown on TV in late August, 2005.  It attempted to be "a four-hour compendium of the matter."  But it buys into the standard, orthodox theory of the events of that day.  It attempts to explain "some of the psychodynamics among the sleeper cells," while trivializing the motivations of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed for his role in the disasters that day.  [Martel, Ned.  "A Dry-Eyed New Look at an All-Too-Familiar Horror," TV review in The New York Times, B26,  Aug 19, 2005.]
But it was 2006 that saw a deluge of propaganda bought and paid for by the cryptocracy to counter the growing 9/11 Truth movement.  'World Trade Center' by Oliver Stone, was released on August 9th of that year.  Unlike the 1990's hit 'JFK,' Stone had abandoned "conspiracy theories" and swallowed the official lies hook, line and sinker - with a wonderful paycheck to boot.  The film was unveiled at the Cannes International Film Festival.  Simon Houpt writes, "The notion of Oliver Stone, Hollywood's former paranoid patron saint of conspiracy theories, labeling his straightforward melodrama as 'truth,' irks some in the growing 'truth movement,' whose members believe the Sept. 11 attacks were not, in fact, carried out by foreign Islamic terrorists but planned by shadowy US government or industrial interests."  [See also:  Houpt, Simon.  "Stone's 9/11 tale coated in thick gloss," in The Globe & Mail, R1, R4, May 23, 2006.]    Another film, The War Within, directed by Joseph Castelo, aired in July 2006.  It featured a Pakistani bad guy, with the FBI saving the day.
TV shows on 9/11 started pouring out in summer of 2006.  Here is a partial list:

Aug 13 = 'Countdown to Ground Zero' on the History Channel
Aug 14 = 'The Miracle of Stairway B' on the History Channel
Aug 21 = 'On Native Soil:  The Documentary of the 9/11 Commission Report' on Court TV
Aug 24 = 'Reel New York:  9/11 Fallout' on WNET
Aug 27 = 'Inside 9/11' on the National Geographic Channel
Aug 28 = 'Triple Cross: Bin Laden's Spy in America' on the National Geographic Channel
Aug 29 = 'The Final Report:  Osama's Escape' on The National Geographic Channel
Sept 3 = 'Inside the Twin Towers' on The Discovery Channel
Sept 5 = 'NOVA: Building on Ground Zero' on PBS
Sept 6 = 'Five Years Later:  How Safe Are We?' On CBS
Sept 10 = 'American Vesuvius' on The History Channel; 'Koppel on Discovery: The Price of
            Security' on The Discovery Channel; '9/11' on CBS; 'The Path to 9/11' on ABC
Sept 11 = 'America Rebuilds Part II:  Return to Ground Zero' on PBS; 'Koenig's Spere' on
            Sundance; 'Dust to Dust: The Health Effects of 9/11' on Sundance; and 'September 11'
            on Sundance.
[Stanley, Alessandra.  "Once Again, the Tragedy You Can't Avoid," in The New York Times, B1, B12, Aug 11, 2006.]

The deluge was orchestrated in a coordinated attack against the burgeoning Truth movement.  As long as writers and producers stuck to the Official Narrative, funding would be granted.  Stray from the narrative, and the movie or television show would face an onslaught of attack.  A miniseries called The Path to 9/11, by ABC/Disney, is one such example.  The show was controversial and almost canceled because it gone one 'official' fact wrong:  it claimed White House national security adviser Sandy Berger refused to authorize the capturing of Osama bin Laden in the 1990's. The show aired anyways, because, in fact, Berger himself admitted as much.  [Gorman, Steve.  "ABC scrambles to alter show," in The Toronto Star, A10, Sept 9, 2006.]
9/11 Commission Vice Chairman Lee Hamilton has intimated that he knows he was made a useful idiot for the cover-up of the awful truth regarding responsibility for 9/11.  In a syndicated column widely circulated in 2005 entitled "What's changed since 9/11?", he answers his own question with:  "everything".  He noted the numerous negative outcomes of the attacks -   wars, heightened security, a decline in civil liberties, and a host of other intangible changes - and recognizes that these were the agendas of his paymasters all along.  He dared not bite the hand which has fed him so well, however.  [Hamilton, Lee.  "What's changed since 9/11?  Everything," in The Globe & Mail, A15, Sept 12, 2005.]
As we probe deeper, we'll uncover more and more of this awful truth.  Sherman Skolnick, a tireless truthseeker and 9/11 researcher, likened the 9/11 attacks to Hitler's Reichstag fire - not by accident, but by design. []  One of the first acts of Hitler after narrowly winning the election of 1932 was to cause the German Parliament buildings to go up in flames.  In collusion with Hitler's intended aims, the press blamed the communists, and the entire incident provided the staging ground for Hitler to institute dictatorship.  The same is true in the United States with George Bush and clan following Hitler's example through the September 11th attacks. [see:]  Skolnick also noted that 4,000 Iraqi military officers were brought to the United States in 1991 by George H.W. Bush for intelligence debriefings and for use in future covert operations.  [550 of these took up residence in Lincoln, Nebraska, and 2,000 of them took up residence in Oklahoma City.  The men and their families were given secret government subsidies, housing, and employment. They provided back-up patsies for both the Oklahoma City bombing, the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, and the 9/11 attacks.]
American Free Press reporter Christopher Bollyn has uncovered more of the damning evidence that the 9/11 attacks were self-inflicted.  Bollyn discovered that Thermite and RDX, chemicals which can cut through steel like butter when ignited, may have been the explosives material used to bring down the towers.  A full 21 days after the attacks, fires were still burning and molten steel was still found in the basement levels of the World Trade Center (WTC) complex.  "The 'squibs' or horizontal blasts of smoke and debris, seen in the high-quality photographs in Hufschmid's Painful Questions documentary and in video images of the collapses, indicate that pre-positioned explosives were used to demolish all three towers."  [Bollyn, Christopher.  "Shocking 9-11 Development," in American Free Press, Nov 28, 2005, pp. 1, 6, 7.]

Controlled Demolition of the Towers

Another researcher who found the official explanation inadequate to explain the existence of molten steel weeks after the attacks is Steven Jones, a tenured professor of engineering at Brigham Young University. Iron melts at 1,535 degrees Celcius.  Thermite, patented in the late 1800's by Hans Goldschmidt of Germany, reacts to produce temperatures in excess of 2,500 degrees Celcius.  Jones struggled to make sense of the testimony of Peter Tully of Tully Construction (of Flushing, NY) and Mark Loizeaux of Controlled Demolition, Inc. (of Phoenix, Md), both of whom were involved in the cleanup of the WTC site in the weeks following 9-11.  Both confirmed that they had come across pools of "literally molten steel" at the bottom of the elevator shafts, seven stories below ground, three, four and five weeks after the attacks.  They also found molten steel in the rubble of WTC 7, which hadn't been hit by either planes or debris.  In a 52-page paper, Jones makes a convincing argument of "aluminothermic process" charge-cutters - such as Thermite - being used to melt the central columns of the WTC buildings to enable them to collapse in the manner in which they did.  Thermite does not require air and can react underwater, which may explain why the hotspots were still present weeks after being doused with water from fire hoses. Thermate, a "new and improved" thermite, uses sulphur to make the steel-cutting properties even more effective, and sulphur residues are exactly what was detected in molten steel samples taken from the site.  [Bollyn, Christopher.  "Professor Says 'Cutter Charges' Brought Down WTC Buildings," in American Free Press, pp. 10-11, May 1 & 8, 2006.  See also:  Bollyn, Christopher.  "Shocking 9-11 Development," in American Free Press, Nov 28, 2005, pp. 1, 6, 7.  This article discusses Jones' arguments at length.]
Jones became an outspoken critic of the Official Version of 9/11, and paid the price.  His 19-page academic paper proving the Towers could not have collapsed on account of the accepted "pancake" theory stirred too much controversy for the University and its corporate sponsors.  Late in November, 2005, the University issued a public statement to distance itself from the views of this renegade professor.  [Szymanski, Greg.  "BYU Professor Told to Stop Talking About 9/11," in American Free Press, Dec 5-12, 2005, p. 7.  See also:]  Eighteen months later, he was fired - despite his tenure.
[Anderson, Mark.  "9-11's 'Smoking Gun'," in American Free Press, p. 3, April 2, 2007.]   A 6-hour DVD - one of the best scientific documentaries on the collapse of the towers - is entitled Improbable Collapse: The Demolition of Our Republic.  [www.improbable]
Witnesses have come forward to testify about underground blasts being detonated seconds before the planes hit the towers.  William Rodriguez, touted as one of the last people to get out of the towers and who was responsible for saving dozens of people's lives, was the first to come forward and report explosions prior to the plane crashes, coming from sublevels of the WTC.  [Szymanski, Greg.  "Three more WTC Workers Say Bombs in Building," in American Free Press, July 18-25, 2005, p. 6.]
Yet another researcher of the 9/11 attacks is Victor Thorn.  Two books by Thorn expose the lies regarding the collapse of the towers and the necessity of concluding they required "insider" pre-planning and involvement are:  9-11 Exposed, and 9-11 On Trial, both published by First Amendment Books & American Free Press in Washington DC.
But by far the most thorough researcher into the science of the WTC towers' collapse is Dr. Judy Wood of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute.  After looking at all the evidence from the point of view of physics and chemical engineering over the course of ten years, Woods offers an alternative explanation for the physics-defying free-fall of the twin towers' collapse.  Nothing short of "directed energy weapons" can fully account for the near-free-fall collapse of the 110-storey structures.  The ultra-fine dust seen emanating from the collapse of each tower is a clear indication, she argues, of the use of directed energy weapons to completely and instantaneously pulverize the towers.  She points to Applied Research Associates (ARA) of Albuquerque, NM as a likely culprit behind the deployment of such weapons on the WTC on 9/11.  "ARA was a contractor in the cleanup of Ground Zero and in the preparation of NIST's reports, and is at the very epicenter of the development of Directed Energy Weapons."  Wood's websites are:,, and   [Bracken, Len.  "Directed Energy Weapons and the World Trade Center Collapse," in Paranoia, pp. 30-5, Issue 45, Fall 2007.  Wood's exhaustive textbook on the physics of the collapse of the towers is:  Where Did The Towers Go? (Published by:  The New Investigation, 2010). ISBN-13: 978-0-615-41256-6.]
Those who challenge the official narrative are categorically labeled the pejorative term "conspiracy theorist".  Challenging the so-called "pancake theory" of the towers' collapse - one of the greatest absurdities in the official explanation - will surely garner one the label.  the same is true for those who question whether Flight 77 was responsible for the explosion at the west wing of the Pentagon.  As Paul Craig Roberts notes, "Dr. Thomas R. Olmstead used the Freedom of Information Act to get a copy of the autopsy list of American Airlines flight 77, and he reports that there are no Arabic names on the list."  Labeling someone a conspiracy theorist is merely a way of stifling debate and suppressing investigation.  "It seems to me that the real conspiracy theories are the explanations that are overweighted with improbabilities" - and those happen to be the official ones.  [Roberts, Paul Craig.  "9-11: Five Years Later - Where Are We?" in American Free Press, p. 9, Sept 11, 2006.]

World Trade Center Cough

The first-responders of 9/11 know the awful truth.  The police and firemen who risked their lives that day overwhelmingly know that 9-11 was an inside job, but they are gagged.  They have lived with a daily fear of retaliation or losing their jobs if they break the FBI gag order placed on them.  [Thorn, Victor.  'Bombs Inside WTC'," in American Free Press, Oct 3, 2005, pp. 1, 7.]  Sadder still is the ongoing story of how the surviving first-responders were shafted by power-elites interested only in exploiting the tragedy while quickly forgetting about their personal sacrifices.  [Anderson, Mark.  "9-11 Health Group Founded For Ground Zero Workers," in American Free Press, p. 4, Dec 25, 2006.]
In all, 47,000 people took part in the rescue and clean-up effort of Ground Zero.  Thousands have fallen ill and died of cancer.  One New York attorney, David Worby, has filed a class action lawsuit against New York City on behalf of 8,500 people, many of them first-responders, who are now sick.  One of the biggest studies was conducted by Mount Sinai Hospital, covering the 2002-2004 period, entitled The World Trade Center Disaster and the Health of Workers:  Five Year Assessment of a Unique Medical Screening Program.  Only 394 of the estimated 10,000 federal workers who responded in an official capacity at the 9/11 tragedy and clean-up have been tested, examined or treated for medical problems stemming from the disaster.  The federal program set up to monitor workers' health was quiety shut down in 2004, its work barely begun.  As a convenient scapegoat, the Health and Human Services Department of NYC is receiving the blame.  Only $177, 977 was spent examining sick workers, a patchwork response at best to the numerous health issues surrounding the events of 9/11.  [Cave, Damien.  "Program Failed to Monitor 9/11 Workers, Report Finds," in The New York Times, Sept 10, 2005, B15.]
Mount Sinai Medical Center conducts the largest study to date of the health effects on WTC cleanup workers:  finds that 70% of them have trouble breathing, and will likely be sick for the rest of their lives.  Dubbed the 'World Trade Center cough', the illness has led to premature deaths for almost every first responder and clean-up crew member. 700 fire fighters who ignored suggestions of wearing a mask during the immediate aftermath of the WTC disaster tried to sue the city in a class-action lawsuit in 2002 that went nowhere. [CBC 'World at Six', 100.5 FM, Jan 30, 2002.]
The problem with class-action lawsuits is that the defendants almost always have vastly superior resources and a larger army of lawyers than do the plaintiffs, and hence few of these sick workers have seen any kind of justice. [Westfeldt, Amy (AP).  "Sickness linked to Ground Zero," in The Toronto Star, A18, Sept 6, 2006.]
In 2006, Author John Tiffany wrote that 9/11 "is an integral part of a Zionist cluster of conspiracies going back at least to the 1960s, and Bush is merely a puppet playing his small part in the overall scheme."  Why, for example, were there numerous building-emptying "maintenance" operations and power outages in the WTC buildings in the week prior to 9/11?  Who were the Israelis from the moving company that took video footage of the entire WTC attacks from the roof of a building in New Jersey?  They were arrested and questioned, but quietly released by the FBI.  Why did Larry Silverstein, a Zionist, take control of the twin towers just weeks prior to 9/11, and jack up the insurance coverage?  And what was the role played by billionaire Israeli Dov Zakheim, the former comptroller for the Pentagon in the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense, who was responsible for the missing trillions from Pentagon budgets?  Zakheim was one of the architects of a document called Rebuilding America's Defenses:  Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century, published by the Project For a New American Century (PNAC).  This document called for a "New Pearl Harbor" to augment America's continued military domination of the world, and on 9/11, they got it. [Thorn, Victor.  9/11 Evil:  Israel's Central Role in the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks. (Washington:  First Amendment Books, 2004).  Reviewed by John Tiffany in American Free Press, p. 17, Aug 21, 2006.]

The Propaganda Function of the Collapse of the Twin Towers

On September 11th, 2001 - a day that will live in infamy - world history entered a new era with the terrorist attacks against the World Trade Center and Pentagon in the United States.  The final consummation of the central dialectic of history (freedom vrs. control) has begun in earnest, and we can now expect to see a gradual unfolding of events that will lead to the first uses of nuclear weapons as weapons of war since 1945.
The reasons for this have become all too clear.  What was sparked on that Day of Infamy was the first of many Clashes of Civilizations to come.  Both President Bush and the conservative organs of media, on the one hand, and Osama Bin Laden and sympathetic fundamentalist Islamic media on the other hand, were quick to employ the rhetoric of 'Crusade' and 'Holy War' to describe the new state of the world:  The Godless and/or Christian West  versus The Defenders of the Faith of Islam.  "America's New War," proudly proclaimed by CNN and puppet stations across America in the weeks following the attack, was initially coined and touted as "Operation Infinite Justice" by Pentagon war-planners.  A more provocative title to the operation could not have been chosen for incensed Muslims, fearful of a spiralling war in the region of Central Asia at the behest of America, operating under the universally-appealing guise of Terrorist Extirpator the world over.  International law has once again been thrown out the window by the American Politico-Economic-Military-Privileged Elite, as the following developments took place in the United States following the attacks.
Morgan Reynolds, a PhD and former chief economist in the Labour Department during President Bush's first term and who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas, came forward in the spring of 2005 to discredit the validity of the US Department of Commerce's National Institute of Standards and Technology report on the WTC towers.  Shyam Sunder was the lead investigator of this team, but the answers provided were a "given" - namely, the official story, that melting steel caused the collapse of the two towers.
The official story still holds because of the gag orders on fire and police department personnel.  The jet fuel burned up within seconds.  The remaining fires were small and under control.  The fact that hundreds of workers stuck inside the towers were hanging out the windows proves that the heat inside was nowhere near hot enough to melt steel.  None of the fire chiefs who testified to the official 9/11 commission said they believed the towers were in danger of collapse.  More tellingly, the subject of "explosions" heard before the collapse became a taboo subject - worthy of gag orders by the FBI.  [Szymanski, Greg.  "Bush Insider Claims WTC Collapse Bogus," in American Free Press, June 27, 2005, p. 1, 13.]
There are many more anomalies and taboo subjects.  For example, why did FEMA agents show up to New York the day before 9/11, to engage in a war game exercise called Tripod II down at New York's pier 29?  This "exercise" was supposed to prepare agents for a "terrorist incident" in lower Manhattan.  What was the "Tripod" named in the title of the exercise - three towers by any chance?  And why did FEMA move quickly to ensure that all the debris of the collapsed towers was removed quickly and without much inspection, sending most of the steel to China rather than domestic steel recyclers?  Better yet:  Why is there no mention of the fact that FEMA already had in its possession in 1999 a manual on 'Emergency Responses' in the event of a terrorist strike, with a picture of the WTC towers and crosshairs over them on the cover?!?  Clearly, the plot to take down the towers in a terrorist "incident" was hatched at least two years prior.
All mere coincidences?  Shouldn't we employ more skepticism towards theories that require us to believe that members of the US government plotted to kill thousands of their own citizens and dupe the world into a fake story about Muslim fundamentalist terrorism?  This is the stated objective of Skeptic magazine, which covered 9/11 "conspiracy theories" in a 2006 issue.
The contributors to this special issue were supposed to be skeptical of any and all claims, employing science to come to reasoned conclusions.  Instead, the entire magazine embarks on a further deployment of official naysayers and 'conspiracy theory' debunkers to obfuscate the truth  and tow the official line.  It uses strawman arguments aplenty, calling the 9/11 Truth Conference attendees as coming from "each extreme of the political spectrum."  Official narrative apologist and magazine contributor Phil Mole senses an extreme irony among the 'conspiracy theorists' who blame 9/11 on a sinister government plan to murder its own citizens for the purpose of establishing a police state:  "if America really was a police state with such terrible secrets to protect, surely government thugs would have stormed the lecture halls and arrested many of those present, or would at the very least have conducted behind the scenes arrests and jailed the movement's leaders.  Yet even the most vocal leaders of the 9/11 Truth Movement are still going strong, and no one at the conference seemed very worried about government reprisals.  This fact seemingly indicates that at some level, the conspiracy theorists themselves don't really believe what they are saying."  [Mole, Phil.  "9/11 Conspiracy Theories," in Skeptic magazine, Vol. 12, #4, 2006.]
The argument most naysayers resort to, without having actually looked at the evidence, is that a "benefit" of believing in conspiracy theories is that they are oddly comforting: "the terrible randomness of life assumes an understandable order."  But this blanket write-off of conspiracy theories ignores all the science and reasoned thinking that goes into them.  Tenured professors at prestigious universities are often the biggest "conspiracy theorists" of all.  Morgan Reynolds, for example, was mentioned on the Washington Times website (not the published newspaper) on June 13, 2005, in a United Press International article by John Daly.  Reynolds was quoted as saying the official theory of the WTC collapse is "bogus."  [Bollyn, Christopher.  "Growing Number of Researchers Publicly Questions 9-11 Theory," in American Free Press, June 27, 2005, p. 12.]   He was only given mainstream attention because "credentials matter."  He has moved along the spectrum of doubt and skepticism so far that now he accepts as unavoidable the conclusion that advanced, pre-arranged explosives were responsible for the collapse of both the WTC towers and Building 7.  [see:]

The Deceptions of 9/11 and the Changing Tide of History

"All stories, whether truth or history, used to be called histories.  But in modern usage, history is concerned with true stories...  When the weight of evidence shifts against the storyteller, it is time to capitulate, for the truth will outlive us.  There is no shame in yielding to it, only in not doing so."  [Polanyi, John.  "The pillars of reason," in The Toronto Star, D12, Oct 22, 2006.]

All that we have been told about the 19 Arab hijackers, the crashes of Flights 93 and 77, the "pancake" collapses of the towers, the missing Air Force... all of it is BULLSHIT.  Bullshit may be a universal phenomenon, but the lack of inquiry into it is what is most astounding.  Bullshit is not the same as lies.  As Harry Frankfurt writes, "It is impossible for someone to lie unless he thinks he knows the truth."  Unconsciously, there is a respect for the truth.  But the bull artist, on the other hand, cares nothing for truth or falsehood.  What matters is getting away with what he says.  This makes the bullshitter potentially more harmful than the liar because of the rejection of any desire to know the truth.  Frankfurt cites Marx to derive the consequence of bullshitting:  "All that is solid melts into air." [Frankfurt, Harry G.  On Bull----.  (Princeton University Press, 2004).  Frankfurt is emeritus professor of philosophy at Princeton.  Reviewed by Peter Edinin in The New York Times, B1, B8, Feb 14, 2005.]
"After piercing the illusions, one is forced to confront a sordid reality.  One sees that 50 years of false-flag terrorism from Iran to Vietnam, from Latin and Central America to Palestine and thence to Afghanistan and Iraq, perpetuated by America Military Industrial Complex Inc., has produced a staggering load of carnage," writes Michael Mandeville, who cites Webster Tarpley's 9/11 Synthetic Terror to inform much of his thinking. "The implications are horrifying.  Americans have become dupes, their government infested by black-arts criminals.  Their best young men have become 'patsies' for sub-rosa imperial programs, and their legal and media classes have become little more than shills who endlessly weave the mantra of the 'American dream' as a glitzy cover story for the rise of an Orwellian Global Order."  [Mandeville, Michael Wells.  "The Deceptions of 9/11 and the Changing Tide of History," in Nexus magazine, Vol 14, #1, Jan-Feb 2007, pp. 11-16, 80.  See also:;;;;;;;;]
Another independent researcher into the collapse of the towers is Dr. Albert Pastore, author of Stranger Than Fiction:  An Independent Investigation of the True Culprits of September 11.  He takes a Sherlock Holmes approach to the murder mystery.  He is willing to entertain the notion that the Mossad was intimately involved in the plot, given the Israeli "art student spy ring" that was rounded up in the weeks following the attacks and the Israeli moving company caught filming the attacks on live camera from Jersey.  He also sees complicity within the administration as an inevitable conclusion. [Szymanski, Greg.  "Sept. 11:  Stranger Than Fiction," in American Free Press, July 4, 2005, p. 7.]
Many researchers took to the road and held Truth conferences around the world.  An example of a fearless researcher is Maurizio Blondet, an Italian journalist who has taken up the 9/11 Truth cause.  One truth tour across Europe by Jimmy Walter (+Rodriguez, Berg, et al) ended in June, 2005.  He was convinced by Eric Hufschmid's 'Painful Deceptions' video.  Walter has since spent millions promoting the video and the accompanying book, telling the world that 9/11 was a "false flag operation" designed to pin the blame on Arabs and Muslims.  But he found stiff push-back any time he mentioned the role of Israelis in 9/11.  Anyone who mentions the Israelis, driving an 'Urban Moving Systems' van carrying bags of money, cameras, surveillance equipment, false ID, etc. - who turned out to be Israeli Intelligence agents filming the WTC attacks live from across the Hudson River - will be deemed an anti-semite by the Anti-Defamation League.  [Bollyn, Christopher.  "9/11 Truth Tour Winds Down in Eternal City," in American Free Press, June 13-20, 2005, pp. 6-7.]
Shortly after 9-11, Fox News created a damning, 4-part investigative series on the Israeli connection to 9-11.  But Jewish groups jumped on it and cancelled the series.  Abraham Foxman, head of the ADL, has actively pressured the head offices of the mainstream media (Fox, CNN, ABC, etc.) to "drop" the story of the Israeli art student connection, as well as the story of  the moving company photographers who were arrested shortly after being seen videotaping the planes slamming into the WTC towers from across the Hudson River in New Jersey.  "Various members of the most powerful Jewish groups in the country visited the White House and petitioned at the highest levels to close down all investigations of the Israeli spies."  George Bush and company complied.  [Glenn, Mark.  "Anti-Defamation League Pressured Media to Spike Reports of 9-11 Foreknowledge," in American Free Press, p. 4, April 2, 2007.]
Israeli super-criminal Kobi Alexander represents the "tip of the 9-11 iceberg" in terms of Israeli involvement in the attacks. Alexander is an Israeli national, and one of the richest men in the world.  He is the former head of Comverse Technology, the US parent company of Verint, Ulticom, Starhome, Mercom and Startel companies.  [Bollyn, Christopher.  "Israeli Criminal Figure Tied to 9-11 Flees America to Avoid Prosecution," in American Free Press, p. 14, Sept 4, 2006.]  COMSOR, an investment fund mutually owned with George Soros, has close links to Odigo, the Israeli instant-messaging company that gave warnings to WTC workers the morning of September 11th to not go to work that day.  Odigo is headquartered only two blocks from the WTC site.  Comverse specializes in "black box" surveillance, and has close links with Israeli military intelligence.  Odigo is now owned by Comverse.  Coincidence?
Kobi Alexander was placed on FBI's most-wanted list due to wide-ranging fraud charges arising from more than 130 inquiries launched by stock market regulators. He was eventually arrested in Namibia on Sept 27, 2006.  He is alleged to have defrauded invesors out of as much as $7.9 billion.  [Frank, Allan dodds, and Bob Van Voris.  "Israeli who fled stock fraud charges arrested in Africa," in The Globe & Mail, B18, Sept 28, 2006.]  He ended up received a "slap on the wrist" due to the work of his powerful legal team defending him.
The official narrative of 9/11 blames the attacks on "failed intelligence".  But we have to ask ourselves:  was it really a failure, or a success?  The NSA sent members of the FBI on a wild goose chase - part of the same Psy-ops perpetrated on Americans.  The New York Times reported that the NSA flooded the FBI with terror suspect lists just prior to 9/11.  Both the FBI and prosecutors "thought the checks, which sometimes involved interviews by agents, were pointless intrusions on Americans' privacy."  [Bergman, Lowell, et al.  "Spy Agency Data After Sept. 11 Led FBI to Dead Ends," in The New York Times, A1, A12, Jan 17, 2006.]
Former chief economist within the Labor Department under the Bush administration, Morgan Reynolds, suffered the wrath of America's Thought Police defending the official narrative after making controversial remarks suggesting he thought the twin towers could not have been brought down by anything other than controlled demolition explosives.  "Considering his place among the Republican faithful, once the media got its claws into his controversial remarks, his words quickly spread (with the help of cyberspace) like an out-of-control wildfire."  [Szymanski, Greg.  "Controlled Demolition?" in American Free Press, July 11, 2005, p. 6.]
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) studied for three years the collapse of the two World Trade Center towers.  A draft of its report came out in January, 2005.  Most of its deliberations were conducted behind closed doors, blocking itself off from an angry public demanding to know answers about why the towers collapsed so suddenly and completely, and to quell rumours of explosives and a "controlled demolition" of the towers by witnesses.  All the agency is willing to report on is building fire safety and structural engineering - ie. making skyscrapers more plane-impact-proof and fire-proof.  The New York Times never deviates from the official line that weakened steel from fires, structural disintegrity, and a "pancake" effect to explain the sudden collapses.  [Dwyer, Jim.  "Closed Hearings Planned on Towers' Collapse," in The New York Times, C14, Nov 12, 2004.]
No one dares ask publicly where the Air Force was that day and why the supposedly hijacked planes weren't shot down before reaching their intended targets.  Bilderberg researcher Jim Tucker noted that there were at least 1,000 intercepts by US military aircraft of civilian aircraft that had entered the no-fly zone over lower Manhattan during the ten years prior to 9/11, 2001.  So where was the airforce that day?  [Tucker Jr., James P.  "Aircraft That Entered WTC Air Space Intercepted 1,000 Times Before 9/11," in American Free Press, p. 6, Dec 5-12 2005.]
Some Dare Call It Treason is the aptly titled book by veteran pilot and 9/11 whistleblower Robert Bowman.  He is the founder of the 'Institute For Space and Security Studies' [5017 Bellflower Ct., Melbourne, Florida. 32940.]  For years, Bowman put out a newsletter called 'Space and Security News', often calling into question the official narrative of 9/11.  Like all the other researchers mentioned so far, despite his credentials, Bowman's expressions of doubt and yearning for the Truth falls on deaf ears.
Instead, we get things like this:  a study by Andrew Karolyi of Ohio State University which calculates the overall impact of terrorism on the global economy.  Karolyi focused on the tens of billions of dollars lost by major companies like Shell, BP, Coca-Cola, McDonalds, American Airlines.  These poor victims...  [Waldie, Paul.  "Terror takes aim at bottom line," in The Globe & Mail, B1, B8, June 6, 2006.]   The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act  was passed by Congress in the months following 9/11, and was later extended until the end of 2007.  It ensured that the federal government purse, - not insurers - would foot the bill when terrorism strikes at home.
In April, 2006, WTC owner Larry Silverstein reluctantly gave up his role as sole landlord of the iconic Freedom Tower being built at Ground Zero.  In all, five new buildings were being built, and Silverstein was still in control of the leasing of three of them.  $31 billion was paid out by insurance companies due to the WTC attacks, most of it going to Silverstein.  In another win for mega-corporations, the House voted to extend the federal program that guarantees that the government will cover some losses from terrorist attacks and reimburse insurers for losses over certain thresholds.  ["House Votes to Extend Terrorism Insurance Aid," in The New York Times, C7, Dec 8, 2005.]  It's just one rape of the American public after another.  In December, 2007, a law was passed by Congress to extend the federal government's liability in the event of another major terrorist attack on home soil, for another 7 years.  [Treaster, Joesph B.  "Terrorism Damage Bill Is Passed By House," in The New York Times, C8, Dec 19, 2007.]
One of the biggest absurdities the naive and gullible public has been forced to swallow is the claim that dishevelled scapegoat Khalid Shaikh (sic) Mohammed was the "mastermind" behind the attacks.  Newswire service AP went to service for the shadow government by pushing this narrative two years after 9/11, claiming that Mohammed confessed that planning for the attacks began in 1996.  [Solomon, John.  (AP)  "Plotting for 9/11 began in 1996, mastermind says," in The Globe & Mail, A13, Sept 22, 2003.]  Nearly seven years after 9/11, the first show trials took place at Guantanamo.  Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four others were singled out as the first to undergo a military trial at the base.  In 2007, the Pentagon released a transcript of Mohammed's closed-door trial at Guantanamo, wherein he purportedly claims to have been responsible for the planning of 9/11 "from A to Z".  He also purportedly took ownership of the 1993 World Trade Center bomb attack, as well as the failed Richard Reid shoe-bomber plot.  How convenient!  In all, Mohammed said he was responsible for 28 individual attacks, the Pentagon report said.  Predictably, much of the report was blacked-out.  [Baldor, Lolita C. (AP).  " 'I was responsible for 9/11 operation,' suspect tells US," in The Toronto Star, A11, Mar 15, 2007.]

Drilling Down on Who Was REALLY Behind 9/11

"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after  this process of grotesque self-deception." -Mark Twain.

Even after 16 years, it is not permitted in polite society to suggest that 9/11 was an "Inside Job" - America's Reichstag Fire - to justify going to war with designated Muslim countries, beginning with Afghanistan and Iraq.  Nevermind that National Security Adviser Wesley Clark has repeatedly gone public admitting as much.  Is it just coincidence that President Bush timed his announcement of an "independent bi-partisan" commission to look into intelligence failures leading up to the war in Iraq with the nauxious playing and replaying of Janet Jackson's boob-exposure at the Superbowl?  [Zerbisias, Antonia.  "Tide Turning on Bush flashdance," in The Toronto Star, C6, Feb 03, 2004.]
It is also taboo to admit the intimate involvement of Israeli spies and key members of the Bush family.  The mere mention of such "outrageous conspiracy theories" will get one expelled from "respectable circles", banished to the sidelines of politically correct thinking.  The furthest one is allowed to venture in such circles is a discussion of Michael Moore's Fahrenheit-911 film, whose only hard-hitting questions revolved around the Bush family's long-standing ties to the BinLaden family and Saudi Royal family.
The question-asking documentary film Loose Change was reluctantly touted by mainstream media as merely another harder-hitting 'Fahrenheit-911'-style film. In reality, the film asks many more questions which hint at 9/11 as an Inside Job, but the film won't go near the involvement-of-Israelis issue.  We have to ask:  who is pushing the film?  As it turns out, members of the billionaire Simon family, who have close business connections with Larry Silverstein as well as Zionist causes in Israel.  [Bollyn, Christopher.  "9-11 Cover-Up in Full Swing," in American Free Press, p. 14, May 29, 2006.]
It gets even stranger.  According to two articles in the Progressive Populist written by Margie Burns, from 1993 to 2000 Marvin Bush (dubya's younger brother) served on the board of Securacom (which has since been renamed Stratesec).  The chairman of Stratesec is Wirt D. Walker III, a cousin of Marvin and George Walker Bush.  Securacom had contracts to provide security for Dulles International Airport (where Flight 77 originated), as well as the World Trade Center in New York.  Securacom's backers included a number of wealthy Kuwaitis, through a company called KuwAm (Kuwaiti-American Corp), and Stratesec is known to have rich Saudi investors.  Wirt Walker serves as a managing director of KuwAm, which maintains offices in the Watergate complex along with Riggs Bank.  George W. Bush's uncle, Jonathan Bush, sits on the board of Riggs Bank, and along with a number of other shady banking operations in the past, Riggs Bank funneled money to Omar al Bayoumi and Osama Basnan, two Saudi students in California associated with two of the 9/11 hijackers.  [Madsen, Wayne.  "Marvin Bush Employee's Mysterious Death," in (Oct 10, 2003).]
Things get really strange when we learn that until November 2002, Marvin Bush served on the board of HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. (formerly Houston Casualty Company), a re-insurer for the World Trade Center.  Bush still serves as an adviser to the firm.  Wirt Walker serves as CEO of Aviation General, an aircraft company backed by KuwAm.  Aviation General, formerly Commander Aircraft, brokered the sale of airplanes to the National Civil Aviation Training Organization (NCATO), located in Giza, Egypt, the hometown of lead hijacker Mohammed Atta.  NCATO  is closely tied in with Embry-Riddle University in Daytona Beach, Florida - the flight school that was investigated by the FBI for training at least one of the 9/11 hijackers.
The frightening truth about 9/11:  It was an inside job.  Every detail of the day was carefully planned out months and years ahead of time by a small cadre of conspirators within the Bush administration, who then flushed out their execution of plans on a need-to-know basis.  The "mysterious plane" seen circling over Washington DC on the morning of 9/11 when all other planes were grounded was the likely headquarters of the long-planned operations.  The E-4B "doomsday plane" (as it is known) is the world's most sophisticated plane.  The E-4B has the ability to communicate with all military commands worldwide and is a complete substitute for the Pentagon. It contains the doomsday computers and telecommunications command post that would direct World War V.  Is this where Cheney and gang were, while Bush read his childrens' story books in Florida?  [Thorn, Victor.  "Did 'Doomsday Plane' Direct 9/11 Attacks?" in American Free Press, B4, Sept 1, 2008.]
The tragedy of 9/11 unintentionally disclosed other secrets.  Intelligence expert William Arkin notes that only as a result of 9/11 did we learn about 'Site R', one of the undisclosed locations used by Vice President Dick Cheney to run Shadow Government operations.  "Site R is a granite mountain shelter just north of Sabillasville, Maryland, near the Pennsylvania border.  It was built in the early 1950's to withstand a Soviet nuclear attack."  Arkin learned that 'Treetop' is the name of the presidential emergency successor support plan, to provide war plans to successors to the president in the event of a decapitating nuclear strike.  [[Arkin, William M.  Code Names:  Deciphering US Military Plans, Programs and Operations in the 9/11 World.  See:]

The Anthrax and Smallpox Scare

One of the many ways in which the 'Insider' perpetrators of 9/11 kept the level of tension in the nation high in the weeks which followed was the anthrax scare.  Members of Congress and major media figures began receiving letters through the US Postal Service beginning three weeks after the attacks.  On October 4th, 2001, Bob Stevens of American Media in Florida was hospitalized with inhalation anthrax, and died the next day, setting off a firestorm of nationwide fear and panic.  On Oct. 8th, Anthrax was found throughout the Boca Raton, Fla., offices of American Media, publisher of the National Enquirer, causing the building to close - not for a week or a month, but for five years.  So much for their journalistic dirt-digging...
On Oct. 12th, an NBC employee in New York City tested positive for anthrax poisoning.
On Oct. 15th, it was Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle's turn.  The following day, the 7-month-old son of an ABC News freelance producer tested positive for anthrax poisoning. The baby developed a rash soon after visiting the network's Manhattan offices on Sept. 28th.  On Oct. 18th, a CBS employee and a New Jersey postal worker tested positive for anthrax poisoning.
On Oct. 23rd, two postal workers from the Brentwood facility in Washington, D.C., were confirmed to have died from inhalation anthrax.  Three days later, a U.S. State Department mailroom staffer was hospitalized with anthrax poisoning.  And on Oct. 28th, another New Jersey postal employee tested positive for anthrax poisoning.  Two days later, a New Jersey patient becomes the 15th reported case of anthrax poisoning.  In all. five people died and thirteen were injured in what became known as the 'Amerithrax' scandal.
The envelopes used all shared one common characteristic:  child-like block-letter printing of addresses.  The fear and panic across the nation had the intended effect:  continue the state of terror while civil-rights-annulling legislation - the Patriot Act - was quietly passed through an otherwise shut-down Congress.  The obvious questions to ask were:  Who was sending the letters?  Where did they get the military-grade anthrax?  And just as important, Who was being targeted?  Stevens, the first recipient of an anthrax-laced letter and first to die, was a journalist best known for his exposes of Bush family crimes.  Senator Daschle held sway over Congress to push through the Patriot Act.  Tom Brokaw and other leading news figures held the keys to the dissemination of the 'official narrative' (Big Lie) of 9/11.  To the outsider, it is obvious what was going on here:  more psy-ops, more manipulation and control of mass consciousness to cover-up the crimes, and more targeting of undesirables (like Stevens) who "knew too much".
It took until June 25, 2002, for FBI agents to close in on a suspect in the Amerithrax attacks.  The FBI searched the residence of Steven Hatfill, a scientist who worked in the government's biodefense labs at Fort Detrick, Md.   It took them until August to name Hatfill as a "person of interest".  He was just a scapegoat, and was never fully prosecuted.  As a result, on July 13, 2004, The New York Times was sued by Hatfill for defamation. He also sued the Justice Department for ruining his life and career.  Nearly three years later, a federal judge dismissed Hatfill's libel suit against The New York Times, but on June 27, 2008, Hatfill quietly received a $5.8 million settlement in his suit against the government.  This was a pyrrhic victory for Hatfill, whose life had been a living hell for four years.  [Glenn, Mark.  "DoJ Ponies Up $5.8 Million to Terror Suspect," in American Free Press, p. 11, July 28, 2008.]
Not content to go without a scapegoat, the FBI went after another helpless US government scientist:  Bruce E. Ivans.  He was labeled "delusional" by the FBI, the only person capable of such a sick "lone nut" terror binge.  [Thorn, Victor.  "The Strange Death of Yet Another Microbiologist," in American Free press, pp. 6-7, Aug 25, 2008.]  His life, too, was destroyed by the resulting negative attention.  On July 29, 2008, Ivins committed suicide.  Those who know him paint a different picture of him than the FBI.  He was happy and stable, and had assisted the government in its search for the anthrax culprit.  Researcher Victor Thorn thinks the real culprit was a co-worker -  Dr. Philip M. Zack - who has long been rabidly anti-Arab and pro-Israeli Jew.  Thorn asks:  "Was the entire anthrax hysteria motivated to cast further suspicion on Muslims to justify the neo-cons' desire for a Mideast war?  Was the anthrax scare akin to Saddam Hussein's purported WMDs, another tactic to push us toward an Iraqi invasion?  Were Steven Hatfill and Bruce Ivans scapegoats used by the government to divert attention from Dr. Zack's involvement?  Finally, are many of the world's top microbiologists being murdered to minimize efforts to counter the effects of a future bio-terrorist attack?"  No fewer than 24 microbiologists have mysteriously died in the 2001-8 period.  What did they know that warranted their assassination?
Unwilling to even entertain the notion that Amerithrax was an 'Inside Job' caused by the same 'Insiders' who masterminded 9/11, there was really no choice for journalists except to grasp at straws.  The Toronto Star's Stephen Handelman, for example, drew this slender thread of a connection:  One of the hijackers, who died aboard flight 93 when it crashed in Pennsylvania, Ahmed Alhaznawi, was rooming with other alleged hijackers in Boca Raton, Florida, and came down with strange symptoms three months prior to Sept. 11th.  It was never proven that his symptoms were caused by anthrax, but Handelman thinks this is the missing link.  [Handelman, Stephen.  "New Twists in Anthrax Probe," in The Toronto Star, A25, March 26, 2002.]  It was probably a common cold.
The other major function of the Amerithrax scare was to psychologically prepare the US and its allies for the upcoming pre-planned war against Iraq.  On September 24, 2002, British PM Tony Blair laid out a 50-page dossier that claimed the Iraqi regime was just "45 minutes" away from deploying nerve gas and anthrax on an order by Saddam Hussein.  It also claimed Iraq has been seeking to buy uranium from Africa on the black market to build a nuclear bomb.  It did not name the country (since, in fact, this was a completely fabricated lie).  David Kelly, a British scientist, tried to expose this "sexed-up" dossier for what it was - pure propaganda manufactured by 10 Downing Street - only to pay for it with his life.  One more casualty in the 'War on Terror'.

Naming Names - A Who's Who of 9/11 Orchestrators

The unquestionable mastermind behind 9/11 was none other than Vice President Richard ("Dick") Cheney.  Born on January 30, 1941, in Lincoln, Nebraska, Cheney's rise to prominence is the story of psychopathy in the service of state power.  [Biographical info. below taken from]
Cheney attended Yale university during the JFK years, rubbing shoulders with key secret society members in Skull & Bones.  He then studied political science at Wyoming state university, where he aspired to political office.  When Cheney became eligible for the draft during the Vietnam War, he applied for and received five draft deferments, thus avoiding being shipped overseas.  He was groomed for political service by becoming the Assistant to the President and White House Deputy Chief of Staff under Gerald Ford.  When Donald Rumsfeld was named Secretary of Defense under Ford, Cheney became White House Chief of Staff, succeeding Rumsfeld, from 1975-77.  The two of them worked together on Team B, the secret cabal which sought to overestimate Soviet military power to justify massive increases in US Defense spending and re-ignite the Cold War.  Cheney went on to become the campaign manager for Ford's 1976 presidential campaign, which was lost to Jimmy Carter.
In 1978, Cheney was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives representing Wyoming's at-large congressional district from 1979 to 1989.  He was reelected five times, briefly serving as House Minority Whip in 1989.  Notably, Cheney was the Ranking Member of the Select Committee to investigate the Iran-Contra Affair, helping ensure the bigger secrets of mass drug importation into the United States by Oliver North, George H.W. Bush, and gang remained a secret to the public.  Between 1987 and 1989, during his last term in Congress, Cheney was a director of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) foreign policy organization.
As Bush became president in 1989, Cheney was chosen to be his Secretary of Defense after John Tower (another Iran-Contra cover-upper) was rejected in Senate hearings. He directed the United States invasion of Panama and Operation Desert Storm in the Middle East. In 1991, he was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by Bush.
Cheney directed the development of a Pentagon plan to ensure U.S. military dominance in the post-Cold War era.  In 1991, Cheney dispatched the first of 26,000 U.S. troops to Somalia as part of the Unified Task Force (UNITAF), ostensibly designed to provide security and food relief.  Cheney's successors as Secretary of Defense, Les Aspin and William J. Perry, had to contend with both the Bosnian and Somali issues, which grew into wider wars due to US meddling.  Out of office during the Clinton administration (1993-2001), Cheney was the Chairman and CEO of Halliburton Company, beginning in 1995.  He also joined the American Enterprise Institute. Around the same period, he served a second term as a Council on Foreign Relations director. He was also a member of the board of advisors of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA). These positions of power and influence led to Bush Jr.'s decision to select him as his VP running mate in the 2000 presidential election.  After legal wrangling against Al Gore over who actually won that election, Bush and Cheney assumed the top positions in the land on January 20, 2001.
Cheney's record as CEO of Halliburton was subject to some dispute among Wall Street analysts. A 1998 merger between Halliburton and Dresser Industries attracted the criticism of some Dresser executives for Halliburton's lack of accounting transparency. Although Cheney is not named as an individual defendant in the suit, Halliburton shareholders were pursuing a class-action lawsuit alleging that the corporation artificially inflated its stock price during this period. In June 2011, the United States Supreme Court reversed a lower court ruling and allowed the case to continue in litigation. Cheney was named in a December 2010 corruption complaint filed by the Nigerian government against Halliburton, which the company settled for $250 million.
Cheney became one of the front-men and chief proponents of the Official Narrative of 9/11, going on talk-shows nearly every Sunday morning to paint a picture of "19 Arab hijackers with box-cutters taking the American military and intelligence by surprise."  This then became the justification for wars against Afghanistan and Iraq, as Cheney laboured intensively to draw the connections between the 9/11 terrorists and both Al Qaeda/Osame bin Laden and Saddam Hussein.  Operation Iraqi Liberation (O.I.L.) was launched in 2003, before the poor optics of this acronym forced embarrassed (or hubris-filled) war-mongers like Cheney to change the name of the war to Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Beginning in 2003, Cheney's staff opted not to file required reports with the National Archives and Records Administration office charged with assuring that the executive branch protects classified information, nor did it allow inspection of its record keeping. Cheney refused to release the documents, citing his executive privilege to deny congressional information requests.  Media outlets such as Time magazine and CBS News questioned whether Cheney had created a "fourth branch of government" that was not subject to any laws.  A group of historians and open-government advocates filed a lawsuit in the US District Court for the District of Columbia, asking the court to declare that Cheney's vice-presidential records are covered by the Presidential Records Act of 1978 and cannot be destroyed, taken or withheld from the public without proper review.  This motion failed.
Cheney's connections to the world's most powerful are painfully obvious.  For example, we find Pope Benedict XVI, Vice President Dick Cheney and Mrs. Lynne Cheney at a farewell ceremony for the Pope at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York.  Cheney has been characterized as the most powerful and influential Vice President in history.  Both supporters and critics of Cheney regard him as a shrewd and knowledgeable politician who knows the functions and intricacies of the federal government. A sign of Cheney's active policy-making role was then-House Speaker Dennis Hastert's provision of an office near the House floor for Cheney in addition to his office in the West Wing, his ceremonial office in the Old Executive Office Building, and his Senate offices (one in the Dirksen Senate Office Building and another off the floor of the Senate).  Everyone, it seemed, had to answer to Dick Cheney.
His dark side is lesser known by the public.  On February 14, 2010, in an appearance on ABC's This Week, Cheney reiterated his support of waterboarding and for the torture of captured terrorist suspects, saying, "I was and remain a strong proponent of our enhanced interrogation program."  On July 11, 2009, CIA Director Leon Panetta told the Senate and House intelligence committees that the CIA withheld information about a secret counter-terrorism program from Congress for eight years on direct orders from Cheney. Intelligence and Congressional officials have said the unidentified program did not involve the CIA interrogation program and did not involve domestic intelligence activities - but these later turned out to be lies. They have said the program was started by the counter-terrorism center at the CIA shortly after the attacks of September 11, 2001, but never became fully operational, involving planning and some training that took place off and on from 2001 until 2010.  The Wall Street Journal reported, citing former intelligence officials familiar with the matter, that the program was an attempt to carry out a 2001 presidential authorization to capture or kill al Qaeda operatives around the world in secret.
Cheney has actively promoted an expansion of the powers of the presidency, saying that the Bush administration's challenges to the laws which Congress passed after Vietnam and Watergate to contain and oversee the executive branch - the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, the Presidential Records Act, the Freedom of Information Act and the War Powers Resolution - are, in Cheney's words, "a restoration, if you will, of the power and authority of the president".  This centralization of power has remained in effect through the Obama and Trump administrations.
Critical biographies of Cheney are wanting.  Mainstream bookstores usually only provide fauning accounts of his life written by secret society apologists.  Stephen Hayes' account is a perfect example.  Cheney's time spent with Hayes in interview for the biography is equal to all the time he spent with other journalists put together.  Hayes writes for The Weekly Standard - a publication owned by arch-Zionist and neoconservative war-monger Billy Kristol.  [Hayes, Stephen F.  Cheney:  The Untold Story of America's Most Powerful and Controversial Vice President.  (HarperCollins Publishers, 2007).  Reviewed by Carl M. Cannon in The New York Times Book review, p. 17, Sept 2, 2007.]
Cheney has been compared to Darth Vader, a characterization originated by his critics, but which was later adopted humorously by Cheney himself as well as by members of his family and staff.  As a result of Cheney having admitted that he 'signed off' on the so-called "enhanced interrogation techniques" program, some public officials, as well as several media outlets and advocacy groups, have called for his prosecution under various anti-torture and war crimes statutes.  Of course, he goes unpunished and lives a lavish lifestyle in retirement as a multi-millionaire knowing the darkest secrets this world has to offer - including his own role in masterminding 9/11.

Donald Rumsfeld

Cheney's superior by 8 years and partner in crime is Donald Henry Rumsfeld.  Born on July 9, 1932 in Chicago, Illinois, Rumsfeld was another republican party apparatchik who rose to power by expanding the military-industrial-intelligence-Big-Pharma complex for the nascent fascist police state.  Educated at Princeton, rumsfeld went on to serve in the US Navy during the Eisenhower years. Rumsfeld served as the 13th Secretary of Defense from 1975 to 1977 under President Gerald Ford, and as the 21st Secretary of Defense from 2001 to 2006 under President George W. Bush. He is both the youngest and the second oldest person to have served as Secretary of Defense. Additionally, Rumsfeld was a three-term U.S. Congressman from Illinois (1963–1969), Director of the Office of Economic Opportunity (1969–1970), Counsellor to the President (1969–1973), the United States Permanent Representative to NATO (1973–1974), and White House Chief of Staff (1974–1975).  [All biographical information taken from]
After serving in the Navy for three years, he mounted a campaign for Congress in Illinois' 13th Congressional District, winning in 1962 at the age of 30. While in Congress, he was a leading co-sponsor of the Freedom of Information Act. Rumsfeld reluctantly accepted an appointment by President Richard Nixon to head the Office of Economic Opportunity in 1969; appointed Counsellor by Nixon and entitled to Cabinet-level status, he would also head up the Economic Stabilization Program before being appointed Ambassador to NATO. Called back to Washington in August 1974, Rumsfeld was appointed Chief of Staff by President Ford. Rumsfeld recruited a young one-time staffer of his, Dick Cheney, to succeed him when Ford nominated him to be Secretary of Defense in 1975.  He also hired arch-conspirator Frank Carlucci (of Iran-Contra and Carlysle Group fame) during this period.
In February 1973, Rumsfeld left Washington to serve as U.S. Ambassador to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in Brussels, Belgium. He served as the United States' Permanent Representative to the North Atlantic Council and the Defense Planning Committee, and the Nuclear Planning Group.  He fought against moves toward detente with the USSR, instead devising plans to carpet-bomb that nation with nuclear weapons.  He helped NATO covert operatives carry out Gladio false-flag operations to demonize left-leaning political groups.
Rumsfeld spearheaded Team B, which deliberately exaggerated the Soviet threat in order to justify massive new military expenditures and a more aggressive stance towards the USSR. For this reason, he oversaw the development of cruise missiles, the B-1 bomber, and a major naval shipbuilding program. In 1977, Rumsfeld was awarded the nation's highest civilian award, the Presidential Medal of Freedom.  Kissinger, his bureaucratic adversary, would later pay him a different sort of compliment, pronouncing him "a special Washington phenomenon: the skilled full-time politician-bureaucrat in whom ambition, ability, and substance fuse seamlessly."
When Ford lost the 1976 election, Rumsfeld returned to private business life, and was named president and CEO of the pharmaceutical corporation G. D. Searle & Company.  in 1985, Searle was sold to Monsanto.  He was later named CEO of General Instrument from 1990 to 1993, and chairman of Gilead Sciences from 1997 to 2001.  In this capacity, he used Big Pharma to carry out foreign policy objectives of the United States, spreading tainted vaccines throughout the "undesirable" populations of the Third World.  Using media connections to blow up the risks of "bird flu", Rumsfeld was able to profit hundreds of millions of dollars promoting its antidote vaccine, Tamiflu (Oseltamivir).
As President Reagan's Special Envoy to the Middle East, Rumsfeld met with Saddam Hussein during a visit to Baghdad in December 1983, during the Iran–Iraq War.  [On the media coverage of Rumsfeld and Saddam shaking hands in 1983, see Normon Solomon's article in Z Magazine, Jan 2006, p. 5.]  When Rumsfeld visited Baghdad on December 20, 1983, he met Hussein at Saddam's palace and had a 90-minute discussion. They largely agreed on opposing Syria's occupation of Lebanon; preventing Syrian and Iranian expansion; and preventing arms sales to Iran. Rumsfeld suggested that if U.S.-Iraq relations could improve the U.S. might support a new oil pipeline across Jordan, which Iraq had opposed but was now willing to reconsider. Secretary of State George Shultz and Donald Rumsfeld were central players in the negotiations with Saddam Hussein to build this pipeline.  Most telling, in light of the ostensible reasons for going after Saddam Hussein in 2003, the secret archival material dug up by the Institute for Policy Studies found that "From 1983 to 1988, Iraqi warplanes dropped over 13,000 chemical bombs.  Iran first reported Iraq's use of chemical warfare well before Rumsfeld met with Saddam in December 1983, yet Reagan's envoy recorded no discussion of this horror."  When Rumsfeld met with Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz on March 26, 1984, he also ignored the continuing attrocities and focused on increasing Iraq's oil exports.  The Export-Import Bank (Ex-Im) and the US Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) were the instruments used by the US State Department to facilitate the construction of the Aqaba pipeline on behalf of Bechtel corporate interests.  [In addition to Wikipedia, see here:  Vallette, Jim, Steve Kretzmann, and Daphne Wysham.  Crude Vision.  (Washington DC:  Institute For Policy Studies, March 2003).]
In 1990, using April Glaspie to deliver the incentive for Iraq to invade Kuwait, Rumsfeld turned the American alliance with Saddam on its head and pronounced Iraq the principle obstacle to establishing the New World Order.  An intense propaganda war ensued, including the infamous "Iraqi soldiers through babies from incubators onto the cold cement floor" story that grabbed international headlines.  The entire story was staged, as would be revealed long after reducing the Iraqi nation to rubble in 1991.
In addition to taking the position of Middle East envoy, Rumsfeld served as a member of the President's General Advisory Committee on Arms Control (1982–1986); President Reagan's Special Envoy on the Law of the Sea Treaty (1982–1983); a senior adviser to President Reagan's Panel on Strategic Systems (1983–1984); a member of the Joint Advisory Commission on U.S./Japan Relations (1983–1984); a member of the National Commission on the Public Service (1987–1990); a member of the National Economic Commission (1988–1989); a member of the Board of Visitors of the National Defense University (1988–1992); a member of the FCC's High Definition Television Advisory Committee (1992–1993); a member of the U.S. Trade Deficit Review Commission (1999–2000); a member of the Council on Foreign Relations; and Chairman of the U.S. Commission to Assess National Security Space Management and Organization (2000). Among his most noteworthy positions was Chairman of the nine-member Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States from January to July 1998. In its findings, the commission concluded that Iraq, Iran, and North Korea could develop intercontinental ballistic missile capabilities in five to ten years and that U.S. intelligence would have little warning before such systems were deployed.
For his services to the New World Order, Rumsfeld was appointed Secretary of Defense for a second time in January 2001 by President George W. Bush. During his tenure he was one of the key individuals responsible for the restructuring of the military in the new 21st century. Rumsfeld played a central role in the planning of the September 11 attacks and the geopolitical objectives thereafter, which included two wars, one in Afghanistan and one in Iraq. In addition to war strategy, Rumsfeld's tenure became highly controversial for the use of enhanced interrogation techniques as well as the Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse scandal.  Rumsfeld gradually lost political support, and he resigned in late 2006.  He has lived "happily ever after" ever since, away from the public spotlight, enjoying his tens of millions of dollars "earned" by killing people and planning the destruction of planet Earth.
Rumsfeld is not exactly a "warm" figure.  To suggest (as he has) that he was woefully unaware of the planning of the 9/11 attacks is disingenuous at best, and an outright lie at worst.  Unquestionably, he was one of the masterminds of 9/11.

The Bush Family Arch Conspirators

I have already written extensively in UD Book 2 about the Bush family and their rise to wealth and power through high-level international crime.  And while many researchers continue to dismiss the younger George (president #43) as intellectually feeble, especially relative to his father (#41), there can be no doubt that "dubya" (Jr) was fully informed of the "Big Wedding" operation that came to be known as 9/11.  Both men can be considered masterminds of that fateful day, intimately aware of the operations that would kill thousands of their own citizens.
The father-son relationship lies at the heart of the Bush II presidency. [Weisberg, Jacob.  The Bush Tragedy.  (Random House, 2007).  Reviewed by Michiko Kakutani in The New York Times, B33, B38, Feb 01, 2008. (A biography) Also reviewed by Alan Brinkley in The New York TImes Book Review, p. 2, Mar 2, 2008.]
Honest biographers have pointed out the disturbing truth that George Herbert Walker (Dubya's maternal great-grandfather) was one of Hitler's most important backers on Wall Street.  [Aarons, Mark, and John Loftus.  Secret War Against the Jews (1994)]  In 1926, Walker arranged to have his new son-in-law, Prescott Bush (George H.W. Bush's father) hired as Vice President at W.A. Harriman and Company on Wall Street.  Prescott became a senior partner when Harriman merged with a British-American investment company to become Brown Brothers Harriman.  In 1934 Prescott Bush joined the Board of Directors of Union Banking, whose assets were closely aligned with Fritz Thyssen, the German industrialist who backed Hitler's rise to power with millions of dollars.
Under the 'Trading With the Enemy' Act, the US government ordered the seizure of Nazi Germany's banking operations in New York City on October 20, 1942.  These operations were under the direction of Prescott Bush.  Another book, The Splendid Blonde Beast:  Money, Law and Genocide, goes into exhaustive detail on Bush-Harriman Nazi money laundering.  Michael Kranish covers the same Bush-Nazi relationships in The Rise of the Bush Family Dynasty published in The Boston Globe.  [Bush family ties to arming Hitler:]   George H.W. Bush's anti-Semite/Nazi/fascist connections were partially exposed during the 1988 presidential campaign, but never received enough press to prevent him from becoming president.  In 2000 and 2001, the Columbus Alive published a series of articles documenting further links between Bush Sr. and the Reverend Sun Myung Moon and his own fascist networks in Korea and Japan.
Senior Advisor to the President, Karl Rove (known affectionately as 'Turd Blossom") gained the title of "Bush's Brain", from the book by the same title by journalists James Moore and Wayne Slater.  Rove is part of this same network of crypto-fascists.  Rove's grandfather was Karl Heinz Roverer, the Gauleiter of Oldenburg.  Roverer was Reich-Statthalter - Nazi State Party Chairman - for his region.  He was also a partner and senior engineer in the Roverer Sud-Deutche Ingenieurburo A.G. engineering firm, which built the Birkenau labour camp.  "Birds of a feather stick together", they say...
Arnold Schwartzenegger is also connected to the crypto-fascist network.  His father Gustav was a member of Hitler's Strumabteilung (SA) 'brown shirt' stormtroopers.  Gustav Schwartzenegger favoured wearing a Hitler-style mustache.  Arnold was close to former Nazi collaborator and fellow Austrian Kurt Waldheim.  He has been a close friend of the Bush family for decades, and was often seen rubbing shoulders with them at major Republican Party functions like Presidential Conventions.
Countless books have been written about the Bush family and their crucial role in the shaping of foreign policy over the past 50 years, most of them sympathetic.  Books like K.M. Pollack's The Threatening Storm seek to justify the million or more deaths of Iraqis at the hands of the two Bush presidencies as "necessary" and "lesser" evils.  Pollack worked for the CIA analyzing military developments in the Persian Gulf for 7 years, including during the first Gulf War.  Another apologist, Jack Matlock supports his arguments, and was the US ambassador to the Soviet Union from 1987 to 1991.  [Matlock Jr., Jack F.  "Deterring the Undeterrable," in The New York Times Book Review, p. 11, Oct 20, 2002.  Review of Kenneth M. Pollack's The Threatening Storm:  The Case for Invading Iraq. (Random House 2002).]
However, an examination of the never-before published government and corporate memoranda, letters, and telegrams at the National Archives and National Security Archive proves that oil was very much the reason for the US drive to oust Saddam Hussein.  [Available at:, or ]  The desire of the Bechtel corporation to build the Aqaba pipeline to bring Iraqi crude to the Red Sea was central to this plot.  [Vallette, Jim, Steve Kretzmann, and Daphne Wysham.  Crude Vision.  (Washington DC:  Institute For Policy Studies, March 2003).]  Despite pressure and incentives, Hussein ultimately rejected the pipeline plan in 1985, and this marked the beginning of the souring of relations with the United States.
The network of very personal ties of key conspirators within successive US adminis- trations sheds light on the ability to shield such greed-driven motives from public assessments of the reasons for war.  William Draper III (Skull & Bones class of 1950 and close confidant of George H.W. Bush), for example, was the president and chairman of the Export-Import Bank of the United States.  In this capacity, he was able to profit a select group of friends and conspirators to the tune of billions of dollars through the so-called "oil-for-food" program set up ostensibly to alleviate the suffering of Iraqis after the 1991 pulverization at the hands of US jets.  Draper was also in charge of the trust account of the Bush family fortunes during their tenures as president.   This story, and the complex relationship between the US and Iraq in the 1980's, is best covered in Kenneth Timmerman's  The Death Lobby:  How the West Armed Iraq.  [(New York:  Houghton Mifflin Company, 1991).  ISBN:  0-395-59305-0,.  See also:  Los Angeles Times article on Feb 23, 1992 that looked into National Security Decision directives of 1989, authorized by George H.W. Bush, to continue providing loan guarantees to Saddam Hussein.]
The Bush family profit-making role in creating and arming enemies, then quashing them, is only rarely touched upon by mainstream media.  [See, for example:  Wall Street Journal (Sept 27, 28, 2001); ABC News (Oct. 1, 2001).]  This sinister side of the Bushes is covered more fully in Russel Bowen's  Immaculate Deception:  The Bush Crime Family Exposed.  Bowen worked under Norman Schwartzkopf Sr. in the 1950's, and was involved in the ousting of Iran's democratically elected leader in 1953.  Schwartzkopf's son Norman Jr. headed Operation Desert Storm in 1991.  Bush Sr. attempted to assassinate Bowen, a retired General, for knowing too many dirty secrets and trying to expose them.  Bowen was sent to jail on false charges, but lived through the experience and turned vocal whistleblower afterwards.  In an unusual move, President Clinton pardoned him.  As of 2005, he was living in hiding somewhere in South America.
Documentary film maker Michael Moore only scratched the surface when calling into question the role of William Draper in Bush-led conspiracies, as well as the the startling personal connections between the Bushes and the bin Ladens.  A March 3, 2001 press release by the conservative Washington lobbying group Judicial Watch drew attention to these connections.  Even The Wall Street Journal  mentioned these connections in two articles published on Sept 27 & 28, 2001.  The Sept 18, 2001 issue of website also drew the connections, pointing to the Carlyle Group as the primary intermediary between George Bush Sr. & bin Laden.  Kevin Phillips is one of the few brave researchers out there willing to expose these connections, at the rest of assassination.  "With great skill, Phillips illuminates how the 'Bush Dynasty' has long used such old-boy organizations as Yale's Skull and Bones, the CIA, Dillon Read, and most recently the Carlyle Group to further its main objective:  political-economic power."  [Phillips, Kevin.  American Dynasty:  Aristocracy, Fortune, and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush.  (Viking, 2004).  Reviewed in Mother Jones, Feb 2004, pp. 77, 80.]   Phillips exposes the history of Armageddon as an influential concept in American foreign policy - something I exposed in UD Book 1 and Book 2 Part III.
Former Yale student Alexandra Robbins claims Bush inducted 10 bones members into his administration, including the head of the SEC.  [Robbins, Alexandra.  "Powerful Secrets," in Vanity Fair, July 2004, pp. 116-21, 156-9.] "Conspiracy theorists are having a field day speculating about the group that has been called everything from "an international mafia" to "the Brotherhood of Death." [p. 119]  One Bonesman who graduated in the 1980's confided to Robbins:  "They talked about foreign operations at the time, the stuff that became Iran-Contra.  The level of trust was startling.  It was like once you were trusted enough to get in, people just talked openly."  Robbins adds:  "The society is so secretive about Bush's time in Bones that the scrapbooks from his year - each class keeps candid brown-paged scrapbooks to memorialize the experience - have been sealed so knights can't read them.
The group was founded by William Russell in the 1830's, on the legend that when the Greek orator Demosthenes died in 322 BC, Eulogia, the goddess of eloquence, arose to the heavens.  Originally called the Eulogian Club, the society holds that the goddess returned to take up residence with them in 1832.  Members open a shrine to her on Thursday- and Sunday-night meetings, singing "sacred anthems" to her.  The Temple on High Street in New Haven is referred to as "the T" by members.  Every April, "tap" day is held by the various fraternities on campus to pick the next year's recruits.  Initiation takes place in the Inner Temple, or "I.T."  There, current members dress up in various costumes, including the Devil, Don Quixote, Elihu Yale, a Pope, and numerous skeletons.  The candidate is forced to do such things as read a secrecy oath, kiss the Pope's foot, drink "blood" from Yorick (a skull), and receive a nickname.  Henry Luce was dubbed "Baal," while George Bush Sr. was dubbed "Magog."  "Perhaps the most prevalent rumor about Bones is that initiates must lie naked in a coffin and masturbate while recounting their sexual histories."  As we learned in UD Book 3 Part I, sexual blackmail is the single most used method to compromise and control people.
The question "Do you know General Russell?" is a sure-tell way to ask someone whether or not they are a member.  Former alumni or "patriarchs" are part of on-going networks that survive the decades of changing members, and these patriarchs meet with current members or "knights" on "Pat Night" several times a year.  On such nights, job offers are circulated and intergenerational conviviality is extended.   Just like their Jewish counterparts who refer to non-Jews as 'goyim', non-Bones-members are referred to as "barbarians." [p. 156]
John Kerry was a devoted member of the organization, just as with Bush.  His close friend John Shattuck, who later went on to become assistant secretary of state under Bill Clinton, was the man who originally tapped Kerry.  David Thorne, also a Bones member in the mid-'60's, became Kerry's campaign manager.  David's twin sister Julia was Kerry's first wife.  Kerry's second wife, Teresa, had become the daughter-in-law of a bonesman when she married her first husband, Senator John Heinz. [p. 156-7]   We've already learned how Kerry served a pivitol function in the late 1980's covering up the drug-dealing side of Iran-Contra.  For this he was rewarded with a shot at the presidency in 2004, as well as the position of Secretary of State under president Obama.  Neither Bush nor Kerry were willing to discuss the fact that the 2004 Presidential election included one Bonesman facing another.  "It's a secret," Kerry deadpanned when host Tim Russert asked him about his membership on Meet The Press.  "It's so secret we can't talk about it," Bush quipped when similarly asked by Russert on a February 2004 airing of the program.  "It's a win-win situation," says one 1960s Bonesman.  "If there is a goddess, it looks like she is smiling on them both."  No goddess was smiling on Russert, however:  for asking a taboo question on national television, he was later rewarded with an early death.
When George "dubya" began looking for a job, he was first hired by former Bonesman Robert Gow.  When he created his own business in 1977, his uncle Jonathan Bush ("a fanatical Bonesman") lined up $565,000 from 28 investors.  The largest amount was from fellow Bonesman William H. Draper III, who has since become a trustee of Bush family fortunes.  Even Bush's Rangers baseball deal involved a Bonesman - Edward Lampert (Bones 1984).  In October 2000, Stephen Adams (Bones 1959) spent $1 million on billboard ads in key states for Bush's presidential election bid.  Once in the White House, one of the first social gatherings Bush held was a reunion of his Skull and Bones 1968 clubmates.  [p. 158]  Another reunion was held at Camp David two years later.  Bush chose Robert McCallum (Bones 1968) to become associate attorney general.  1984 Bonesman David Wiseman joined the civil division of the Justice Department, asserting executive privilege in a move to make presidential pardons more secretive than in the past.  Among Bush's other Bones appointees are Bill Donaldson (1953), chairman of the SEC; Edward McNally (1979), general counsel of the Office of Homeland Security and a senior counsel to the president; Rex Cowdry (1968), associate director of the National Economic Council; Roy Austin (1968), ambassador to Trinidad and Tobago; Evan G. Galbraith (1950), the secretary of defense's representative in Europe and the defense adviser to the US mission to NATO; James Boasberg (1985), associate judge of the superior court of the District of Columbia; and Bush's cousin George Herbert Walker III (1953), ambassador to Hungary.  Another Bonesman, Frederick Smith (1966), almost became the Secretary of Defense, but withdrew his nomination due to health reasons.
"Bonesmen say the president values the society because it became an extension of his family:  the Bush-Walker web in Bones includes at least 10 members...", writes Robbins.  Bonesman Robert Draper even became a sycophantic biographer of the Bush Jr. Anthony Lewis notes how Draper was given "extraordinary access to this press-averse president and his aides, including six private meetings with Bush, surely in the belief that he would be a friendly biographer."  [Draper, Robert.  Dead Certain:  The Presidency of George W. Bush.  (Free Press, 2007).  Reviewed by Anthony Lewis in The New York Times Book Review, pp. 26-7, Nov 4, 2007.]  Lewis.  "Draper is friendly, at times admiring.  The only real critique of Bush's character is that he is overly sure of himself.  When facts turn out to get in the way, he brushes them off.  The president has always remained utterly confident of victory in Iraq.  He was sure, as Draper puts it, that "history would acquit him."  Draper often uses words like "certitude," "intransigence," "compulsive optimism," and "his obstinate streak."  "What had to be believed, he believed."  This is testimony to the evil and duplicity of our political leaders.
I am reminded of something Margaret Atwood once wrote:  we live in an era of metal men - "men with the heads of eagles, with skins of blue leather...Apologies are thought a sign of weakness, a cue for attack by blood-sniffing lawyers and ruthless opponents."  [Porter, Catherine.  "Haunted by G20 arrest, he wants an apology," in The Toronto Star, A14, June 8, 2013.]
Speaking of blood and ruthlessness, proof surfaced in 2006 that Bonesmen Prescott Bush (dubya's grandfather) stole the bones of Geronimo from his burial site at Fort Sill, Oklahoma.  [Singer, Stephen (AP).  "Geronimo tale lives in 1918 Yale letter," in The Toronto Star, A2, May 10, 2006.]  Grave-robbing is one of the hazing rituals of Skull & Bones members, proving to fellow members their penchant for necromancy while affording the club more skulls to drink blood out of during rituals.


"[G]iven that in the course of history many have acted on beliefs in which many others did not believe, we must perforce admit that for each, to a different degree, history has been largely the theater of an illusion." - Umberto Eco  ["The Force of Falsity", Serendipities (London: Orion Books, 1998). p. 3.]

The grand theatre of illusion we live under as a result of the nefarious undertakings of these arch-conspirators has so far been effectively hidden from mass public consciousness, and thus we are ignorant of the sinister forces we are up against.  Official histories record the actions of these men as "patriotic", in defense of the nation and of all civilized people.  In truth, we live in a kakistocracy, and these are the worst kind of people the world has to offer:  criminal psychopaths who sacrifice innocent lives - including children - in heinous acts of pure evil.
The juxtaposition of "patriotic" and "witchcraft" caused a kind of cortical fission that became the basis of a brilliant and elucidating book series entitled Sinister Forces by Peter Levenda.  Dissecting these forces, weltanschauungskrieg (worldview-warfare) is the best way Levenda can describe what we are really up against.  He writes:

"Intelligence officers and cultists have a lot in common... Secrecy is a way of life for both the spy and the sorcerer; they both use codes and code names; they both pretend to have access to mysteries not available to the general public; they both claim to be able to influence events at a distance with their special abilities and powers. They both specialize in the manipulation of reality. Both are aware that things are not always what they seem to be; and they are both ruthless and often amoral or immoral in the pursuit of their goals, embracing elicit sex, illegal drug use, and even murder as the means to their enigmatic ends." [Levenda, p. 329]

Both spooks and cultists are accutely aware that people's perceptions of reality can easily be manipulated.  They realize that 'truth' itself is a malleable thing.  Their control of reality - or at least the perception of reality - is a powerful political tool, especially if one has the reach to affect consensus reality.  This is the most powerful kind of psychological warfare in existence, because it shapes the history and destiny of all of human civilization.  Prior to the world wars, but in anticipation of them, Nietzsche wrote:  "We should reconsider cruelty and open our eyes... Almost everything we call 'higher culture' is based on the spiritualization of cruelty, on its becoming more profound: this is my proposition. That 'savage animal' has not really been 'mortified'; it lives and flourishes, it has merely become divine."  [Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil (NY: Vintage Press, 1966), p. 158.]
Levenda continues:  "In order to conduct this investigation I would have to dig very deep, below the surface of official reports, trial transcripts and conspiracy theories. I would have to dig deep below the surface of the American psyche, and trace pieces of evidence back down through several layers of meaning and relevance to find the connective tissue that would make sense of our history, our politics, our collective weirdness. This would have to be nothing less than a deconstruction of our most cherished beliefs and ideals." [Book 1, The Nine, p. xxi]  To come to a proper understanding of what we are up against, we have to overcome a common assumption - that there is a separation between the occult - witchcraft, sorcery and magic - and the uber-rational intelligence agencies that are ostensibly assigned with keeping people safe.  The latter are thought to deal with humint (human-gathered intelligence) and sigint (signals intelligence, or metadata).  We think of them as number-crunchers, like the IRS.  Covert operations are tactical, and rational, with quantifiable goals in mind.
In truth, dating at least as far back as Operation Paperclip, when Nazi scientists were smuggled out of Europe and brought to the United States, more sinister agendas have been afloat.  Many of those scientists were skilled in propaganda and psychological warfare.  A good number were taken from Dachau concentration camp's Block Number Five, where people were regularly experimented upon as human guinea pigs.  Most of the records of such were destroyed on the orders of CIA head Richard Helms prior to the 1975 Church hearings in Congress.  A few escaped the shredder, and that's how we learned about Mockingbird, MK-Ultra and Monarch, and about truth serums, Manchurian candidates, and sex slaves.
Inclusion of the occult into the secret operations of the CIA had become accepted practice by the time of the Kennedy assassination.  Thus, in 1964, we find research papers prepared at the request of the US Army, entitled "Witchcraft, Sorcery, Magic and Other Psychological Phenomena and Their Implications on Military and Paramilitary Operations in the Congo."  The paper studied occult methods for creating political instability and defeating enemy political movements. In 1967, we find Operation Wandering Souls. US Army Psyops and the Joint United States Public Affairs Office (JUSPAO) issued policy #36, "The Use of Superstitions in Psychological Operations in Vietnam."  The policy discusses openly how deeply held beliefs could be turned into psychological weapons and used against populations.
And now it is our turn, to unlock the mysteries of the 9/11 Mass Ritual and learn how "Witchcraft, Sorcery, Magic and Other Psychological Phenomena" are used against us - the people of planet Earth.  Get ready, because this is going to be very eye-opening...

The Forces We're Up Against

Paranoids are the only ones who notice anything anymore.
-Charles Manson
"[T]errorism is nothing more than a form of psychological warfare, as acts of terrorism have no intrinsic military value aside from their effects on the psyches of target populations." [Levenda, Book 1, p. 143.]   All these techniques - psychoactive drugs, hypnosis, acts of terrorism and disinformation - share one ontological purpose:  to manipulate perceptions and re-create reality.
Manipulating perceptions is a Pandora's Box, however, as our own politicians and journalists and academics get duped by the propaganda, not just the ignorant masses.  The most effective way to manipulate perceptions and belief systems is through symbols.
In The Most Dangerous Book In The World: 9/11 As Mass Ritual, author SK Bain breaks it all down for us.  "In an insightful piece entitled 'Symbolic Literacy', author Michael Tsarion observes that we suffer from 'chronic symbol illiteracy' and are subjected to subliminal and subtextual persuasion that constitutes what  he refers to as a psychic dictatorship.  This dictatorship, Tsarion says, "involves the deliberate and subversive manipulation and public purveyance of words, images, numbers, colors, rhythms, and symbols which are subsequently directed, via ubiquitous media oracles, toward the limbic areas of the brain," which, he continues, "produces an elaborate and insidious cryptic language specifically designed to stimulate conflict between fantasy and reality."" [Bain, SK.  The Most Dangerous Book In The World:  9/11 As Mass Ritual.  (Trine Day, 2010), p. 18]
Tsarion rightly believes that we will remain subject to mass manipulation until we "become lucidly cognizant and profoundly educated concerning the power of symbols, not only as transcendent portals, or mathematical devices, but as weapons in the hands of plutocratic elites, with occult agendas, laboring to arrest the mental, emotional, and spiritual maturation of the underclasses." [SK Bain, p. 18]  To accomplish this, technological witchdoctors are employed - cyberspace sorcerers  The techniques they employ go by fancy names like tele-hypnosis, meta-contrast, hemisync, synaesthenia, and embedding.  They hold a tremendous, unacknowledged power over the human mind.

"Symbols are oracular forms - mysterious patterns creating vortices in the substances of the invisible world. They are centers of a mighty force, figures pregnant with an awful power, which, when properly fashioned, loose fiery whirlwinds upon the earth." [Manley P. Hall, Lectures on Ancient Philosophy.  Quoted by SK Bain, p. 17]

Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare

As Michael A. Hoffman has written so powerfully, ritual murder is the most powerful form of mind control.  He predicted the impending mass ritual of 9/11 just months before that fateful day in his seminal work, Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare (2001).   No other single book has served to awaken me to the sophisticated tools of mass mind control used by the global elite.  This tract serves as a textbook for deciphering the world of False Flag terror events that have rocked our world for over 16 years.
      When you read the following excerpts, think about the recent London terror attacks, the Paris and Brussels attacks, 9-11 and 7-7, (and so many more) and see if you can detect the modus operandi of an elite intent not only on processing mass consciousness, but eventually revealing themselves to us in a show of ultimate power and control.

"The most amazing thing about the American people is that they are constantly defending their worst betrayers." [p.19]

"Who then is the modern man? He is a mindbombed patsy who gets his marching orders from 'twilight language' key words sprinkled throughout 'his' news and current events."  [p. 19]

"The symbols that modern man embraces with the naive trust of an infant would be tantamount to billboards reading, 'This way to your death and enslavement'." [p. 21]

"What the Alchemical managers have bred over a millennia is a human race of the most wretched stupidity and ignorance unrivaled in thousands of years... What we observe in the population today are the three destructive symptoms of persons whose minds are controlled by alien forces:  Amnesia, ie. loss of memory. 2. Abulia, ie. loss of will. 3. Apathy, ie. loss of interest in events vital to one's own health and survival."  [p. 20]

"For life in our modern era is little more than life in an open-air mind control laboratory where a form of human alchemy has emerged to transform the mass of targeted percipients - targeted merely by virtue of their being urban dwellers plugged into the electronic and digital pageantry of the Establishment's system-of-things." [p. 19]

"The public have been trained to do this by two principal methods: direct 'speaking' archetypal messages of pure terror ("psychic driving" as the CIA's Dr. Ewan Cameron termed it), encoded in massively publicized "lone nut" mass murders, and the sinister flattery heaped upon them by their masters in the cult of civilization and progress." [p. 19]

The 1615 Rosicrucian manifesto, Confessio Fraternitatis, reveals the psychodrama of human alchemy and the goal of elites - "the Revelation of the Method / Making Manifest of all that is Hidden". "The psychological warfare contained within this esoteric 'confession' is predicated on the following strategy: One day when we have secured our victory we will confess our crimes to a ritually-bound public." [p. 16-7]

"The western masses enter thralldom and bestiality with enthusiasm. They cheer programming and suppression of dissent, they volunteer for digital surveillance, they idolize their executioners and exterminators, they celebrate their new, swinish identity."  [p. 17]

"The double-mind - the profoundly disturbed mind at war with itself and ignorant even of that fact - is a characteristic of the scapegoat-patsy 'lonenut' cult-killers, and of the American people in general.  For, in this time-frame of ours, we are initiated into their cult by means of our exposure to the electronic videodrome... In the 19th century the phenomenon was termed 'masonic apoplexy.' Today it is called zombieism." [p. 35]

John Dee (1527-1608), contemporary of Francis Bacon aka William Shakespeare, was the original "007" master-spy in the British court and the founder of Freemasonry.  "Dee's espionage expertise was gained in part from his mastery of the late 15th century cryptography text, Steganographia, attributed to the Kabbalist Johannes Trithemius, as well as the top-secret volume of twilight language, of uncertain provenance, known as The Stoyga.  Dee was the architect of the British empire itself, conceived as a magical act: 'magical' in the sense that this empire would be powered mainly by illusion, deceit, the double-cross and profound secrecy, as embodied within the science and art of espionage and the religion of esoteric Judaism." [p. 35]

"[A]ny half-way competent student of deception will know that the greatest potential threat always comes from the unsuspected direction. In this case from the force that is misidentified and masked, that force which is fascism with a human face." [p. 41]

"The Hermetic Academy is confident, and not without reason, that we will offer no substantial, meaningful resistance to their imperium. Why?" [p. 40]

"Since we choose to refuse to genuinely heal the rift between the two sides of our mentality by the tough means of repudiating our lying public persona and taking action on the understanding of our true self, we relinquish autonomy to those who make it appear that they can heal us at no great cost or trouble on our part.  Never mind that "They" are also the ones who implanted the rift in the first place. The point is "We" have little or no power." [p. 40]

"The final nail in the coffin of our free will is the fact that we ourselves know in our heart of hearts that the above is false. That is is We the People who have the power and the responsibility and that we could crush Them tomorrow if we chose to. They are only an illusion, every bit as ephemeral as the patter of a carnival sideshow bunco artist, beckoning to us from the other side of the hootchie-kootchie tent. But if we overthrew them tomorrow we would have to write our own scripts. We would have to heal ourselves. We would have to admit the colossal waste and loss and destruction of the past years which our laziness and folly have made possible. We would have to experience the pain of being alive and responsible. We would have to start acting like men and women instead of as slaves and weaklings." [p. 40]

"[T]he rot started in the Renaissance, the stage in western history when the secret society conspirators went from the status of exiles and fugatives to that of insiders." [p. 43]

"The Black Arts adepts who wear police badges, occupy judge's seats and media editor's desks are not simply 'crazed', nor are such intensely publicized ritual murders merely superstitious sacrifices to some kooky devil-god... This theatre of death began as a ritual for the cult-members themselves and ended as a giant magical ceremony for the processing of the entire nation... This is the alchemical psychodrama for the transformation of humanity.  We are processed just by reading or watching 'the news'." [p. 66]

"The Cryptocracy has a much more refined inducement for attendance at their masonic ritual: spectacular optical. Few need to be induced to watch TV or read a sensational, mass market picture magazine or newspaper.  In fact, we pay to do so. Of course, many 'serial' murders are nothing more than the work of a single individual acting out a graphic horror movie he saw, or responding to powerful 'psychotic' impulses for aggression and predation. But others are ritual murders involving a cult protected by the US government and the corporate media, with strong ties to the police. Such killings are actually intricately choreographed ceremonies; performed first on a very intimate and secret scale, among the initiates themselves in order to program them, then on a grand scale, amplified incalculably by the electronic media. In the end what we have is a highly symbolic, ritual working broadcast to millions of people, a Satanic inversion; a Black mass, where the 'pews' are filled by the entire nation and through which humanity is brutalized and debased..."  [p. 67]

"[E]xposure itself does not defeat the cryptocracy, because given the degraded and atrophied nature of modern man's perceptions and insight today, such revelations may only serve to strengthen the cryptocracy's mental hold.  The record shows that the recent revelations of occult crime are almost never been accompanied by arrests, prosecutions, convictions and punishments of the initiates involved, hence the reputation of the cryptocracy's invincibility is heightened by the revelations.  Moreover, the spectacular nature of the revealed crimes carry a highly charged aura of the violent and the erotic and in the final analysis, when exposed to public attention, only become further grist for the seemingly limitless public appetite for shock-titillation and passive voyeurism. Exposure without action against the perpetrators of the crimes revealed, devolves into a kind of perverse advertisement for the prowess of the cryptocrats, who are seen as having performed fantastic feats of criminal enterprise with a genius that renders them immune from the consequences." [p. 53]

"If the truth of what the cryptocracy has perpetrated is grasped and acted upon, the consequences for the conspirators will be annihilation. But if the people fail to perceive the truth or fail to act on their perception, thus rendering unto the Process a kind of tacit consent born of apathy, amnesia and abulia, the consequences for the conspirators will be a giant-step in the advancement of their system of control, that is to say, ever tighter bonds of enslavement for humanity. Why does the cryptocracy bother to gamble so much by going public with what it is doing to us? Because consent fuels their control like no other form of energy." [p. 56]

No comments:

Post a Comment